refactor: Rename repository methods for name-based query derivation

[o-kopysov]

Pull Request

Description

Current PR contains refactoring of the repository method names to enable name-based query derivation.
This change was proposed here.

Because I'm not an expert in name-based queries, I would be grateful for the careful code review.

Also, functional test run is required for this PR.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Code cleanup/refactoring
• Documentation update
• This change requires a documentation update
• CI system update
• Test Coverage update

Testing

Unit tests - passed.

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• My code meets the required code coverage for lines (90% and above)
• My code meets the required code coverage for branches (80% and above)
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@0db1b06). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #541   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   92.56%           
  Complexity      ?      529           
=======================================
  Files           ?       48           
  Lines           ?     1736           
  Branches        ?      208           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1607           
  Misses          ?       64           
  Partials        ?       65           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[m-rudyk]

I see no issue with naming. Happy flow works, UT pass. But we have to test more this change.

[m-rudyk]

Approved

[o-kopysov]

@tiokim Functional test successfully passed on current PR.
Do you have any concerns or comments regarding this PR? Can we merge it?