Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a new requirements file for storing pip freeze results #3320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2016

Conversation

sthirugn
Copy link
Contributor

@sthirugn sthirugn commented Mar 1, 2016

No description provided.

@sthirugn sthirugn self-assigned this Mar 1, 2016
@oshtaier
Copy link
Contributor

oshtaier commented Mar 1, 2016

APT

@elyezer
Copy link
Contributor

elyezer commented Mar 1, 2016

We have a bunch of requirements that are not for running robottelo but syntax/code style checking and also NailGun is missing in the list.

@elyezer
Copy link
Contributor

elyezer commented Mar 1, 2016

ACK, pending comment.

@sthirugn
Copy link
Contributor Author

sthirugn commented Mar 1, 2016

We have a bunch of requirements that are not for running robottelo but syntax/code style checking

I installed my virtualenv using requirements-optional.txt and did a pip freeze. Right now, there is no distinction in requirements-optional.txt to identify the libraries needed just to run robottelo vs. code style checking libraries. So I believe it is okay to leave it as such.

and also NailGun is missing in the list.

  • nailgun needs to release its latest version
  • once the above is done, we can update requirements-freeze.txt with a new nailgun version

@sthirugn
Copy link
Contributor Author

sthirugn commented Mar 1, 2016

Nailgun dependency is now added. This PR is ready for review again.

@elyezer
Copy link
Contributor

elyezer commented Mar 1, 2016

ACK

elyezer added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2016
Added a new requirements file for storing pip freeze results
@elyezer elyezer merged commit a6db09f into SatelliteQE:6.1.latest Mar 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants