-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/set parea default #269
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to d2d0df3
- Looked at
1054
lines of code in12
files - Took 2 minutes and 1 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
1
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. r2r/pipelines/basic/eval.py:40
:
- Assessed confidence :
100%
- Grade:
0%
- Comment:
It seems like theparea
provider is being added as an option for evaluation, but I don't see where thePareaEvalProvider
is defined. Please ensure that thePareaEvalProvider
is properly defined and imported. - Reasoning:
The PR introduces a new feature to set a default provider for evaluation. The changes in the poetry.lock file indicate that the versions of some dependencies have been updated. The changes in the client base file introduce a new method for evaluation. The changes in the eval.py file introduce a new abstract method for evaluation. The changes in the base.py file under deepeval introduce a new class for evaluation using the DeepEvalProvider. The changes in the run_basic_client_old.py file comment out a line of code that was previously running a function. The changes in the eval.py file under pipelines/basic introduce a new class for evaluation using either the DeepEvalProvider or the PareaEvalProvider.
Workflow ID: wflow_FpeVMgqcuj4koMaI
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 4aeeaf7
- Looked at
85
lines of code in2
files - Took 1 minute and 56 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. /Dockerfile:1
:
- Assessed confidence :
50%
- Comment:
The Python version has been updated to 3.10. Please ensure that all dependencies and the application itself are compatible with this version of Python. - Reasoning:
The Dockerfile has been updated to use Python 3.10 instead of 3.9. This could potentially introduce compatibility issues with the existing code or dependencies. It's important to ensure that all dependencies and the application itself are compatible with this version of Python.
2. /Dockerfile:14
:
- Assessed confidence :
50%
- Comment:
The method for installing dependencies has been changed. Please ensure that all dependencies are correctly installed using this method and that there are no compatibility issues with pip. - Reasoning:
The Dockerfile has been updated to use a different method for installing dependencies. Instead of using Poetry directly, it now exports the dependencies to a requirements.txt file and installs them using pip. This could potentially introduce issues if there are dependencies that require specific versions or if there are dependencies that are not compatible with pip.
3. /Dockerfile:27
:
- Assessed confidence :
50%
- Comment:
The command to run the application has been changed. Please ensure that this command correctly starts the application and that all necessary configuration is included. - Reasoning:
The Dockerfile has been updated to run the application using a different command. This could potentially introduce issues if the new command does not correctly start the application or if it requires additional configuration.
4. /Dockerfile:28
:
- Assessed confidence :
50%
- Comment:
There is commented out code in the Dockerfile. Consider removing it to avoid confusion. - Reasoning:
The Dockerfile contains commented out code. This could potentially confuse other developers or introduce errors if it is accidentally uncommented.
5. /README.md:64
:
- Assessed confidence :
50%
- Comment:
The README has been updated with Docker instructions. Please ensure that these instructions are correct and complete. - Reasoning:
The README file has been updated with instructions for running the application in a Docker container. This is a good addition, but it's important to ensure that these instructions are correct and complete.
Workflow ID: wflow_ATjCbooBJAxpcc3V
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 03c952d
- Looked at
34
lines of code in1
files - Took 1 minute and 59 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. Dockerfile:24
:
- Assessed confidence :
100%
- Grade:
0%
- Comment:
The PR description mentions updates to the Dockerfile to use Python 3.10 and modifications to the installation process. However, the diff does not reflect these changes. Please ensure that the Dockerfile changes have been committed and pushed. - Reasoning:
The Dockerfile has been updated to use Python 3.10 and the installation process has been modified. However, the PR diff shows that the Dockerfile has not been changed. This could be a mistake in the PR description or the Dockerfile changes were not committed. I need to comment on this discrepancy.
Workflow ID: wflow_AKXZ5vYeDAJX8IIN
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Performed an incremental review on 5a4e38c
- Looked at
27
lines of code in1
files - Took 1 minute and 31 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. r2r/examples/clients/run_basic_client_old.py:11
:
- Assessed confidence :
100%
- Grade:
0%
- Comment:
Duplicate import statement forR2RClient
. Please remove this line. - Reasoning:
The import statement for R2RClient is duplicated on lines 4 and 11. This is unnecessary and should be removed.
Workflow ID: wflow_fVOIXYGfqZkqsumo
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
* change default * Cleanups * slim docker * repair docker file * cleanup * cleanup
Summary:
This PR introduces a new feature to set the default evaluation provider for the R2R client, updates dependency versions, modifies the Docker setup, adds Docker deployment instructions to the README, and uncommented
asyncio.run(stream_rag_completion())
inrun_basic_client_old.py
.Key points:
poetry.lock
eval
method inR2RClient
class inr2r/client/base.py
_evaluate
method inEvalProvider
class inr2r/core/providers/eval.py
_evaluate
method inDeepEvalProvider
class inr2r/eval/deepeval/base.py
Dockerfile
to use Python 3.10README.md
asyncio.run(stream_rag_completion())
inrun_basic_client_old.py
Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev