-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 254
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/clarify local tut #282
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me!
- Reviewed the entire pull request up to d4157ba
- Looked at
102
lines of code in1
files - Took 40 seconds to review
More info
- Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
additional comments because they didn't meet confidence threshold of50%
.
1. docs/pages/tutorials/local_rag.mdx:73
:
- Assessed confidence :
80%
- Grade:
40%
- Comment:
The link to the API docs might be broken. It's a relative link and might not work depending on the location of the tutorial in the documentation structure. Consider using an absolute link if the documentation is hosted on a website. - Reasoning:
The PR author has made changes to the tutorial documentation. The changes include rephrasing of sentences, addition of new sections, and modification of existing instructions. The changes seem to be aimed at improving the clarity and comprehensibility of the tutorial. I don't see any clear violations of best practices, logical bugs, performance bugs, or security bugs in the changes. The changes are mostly textual and don't involve any code modifications. However, I noticed that the link to the API docs might be broken. It's a relative link and might not work depending on the location of the tutorial in the documentation structure.
Workflow ID: wflow_Y1HOF8ZZhJ29dZVH
Not what you expected? You can customize the content of the reviews using rules. Learn more here.
iCUE-Solutions
pushed a commit
to DeweyLearn/DeweyLearnR2R
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2024
* cleanups * fix pip command quotes * fix pip command quotes * lang tweak * fix ex * clarify local cpp procedure * clarifications
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
This PR improves the clarity and completeness of the tutorial for setting up a local RAG system using the R2R framework, including updates to the pip installation commands, more detailed pipeline configuration instructions, and additional guidance for using Llama.cpp as the LLM provider.
Key points:
/docs/pages/tutorials/local_rag.mdx
Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev