Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ruff checks for numpydocs #5630

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

ruff checks for numpydocs #5630

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

tkknight
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Pull Request

Description

Ruff compliant.

Part of #4721


Consult Iris pull request check list

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (cad46ef) 89.69% compared to head (00f7444) 89.69%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5630   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.69%   89.69%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines       22807    22807           
  Branches     5441     5441           
=======================================
  Hits        20456    20456           
  Misses       1618     1618           
  Partials      733      733           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bjlittle bjlittle self-assigned this Dec 12, 2023
@bjlittle bjlittle self-requested a review December 12, 2023 14:06
@tkknight tkknight marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2023 15:30
Copy link
Member

@bjlittle bjlittle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tkknight Great thanks.

So this is an interim no-op change. You've added Dxxx rules to the .ruff.toml but will only be enabled by removing the pydocstyle category rule "D" ... plus you're working on other pydocstyle rules to address.

I'm totally okay with this 👍

@bjlittle bjlittle merged commit dcff29d into SciTools:main Dec 12, 2023
17 checks passed
tkknight added a commit to tkknight/iris that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
* upstream/main:
  ruff checks for numpydocs (SciTools#5630)
  Add whatsnew entries (SciTools#5626)
@tkknight tkknight deleted the numpydocs1_ruff branch January 9, 2024 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants