Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Javascript single test file execution #1663

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

Sakif-Al-Faruque
Copy link
Contributor

@Sakif-Al-Faruque Sakif-Al-Faruque commented Apr 7, 2024

User description

In selenium documentation, javascript test file execution was missing. Therefore, I added that the command to run a test file for javascript in Running Selenium File > JavaScript section.

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

  • Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
  • Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
  • Improved translation
  • Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing document.
  • I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

Type

documentation, enhancement


Description

  • Added detailed instructions on executing a single JavaScript test file in the Selenium documentation, including a specific command example.
  • Introduced a package-lock.json file to the project structure.
  • Updated the Selenium WebDriver documentation to reference the new JavaScript test execution instructions.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
README.md
Instructions for Executing a Single JavaScript Test           

examples/javascript/README.md

  • Added instructions on how to execute a single JavaScript test file.
  • Provided a command example (node example_script.spec.js) for running a
    specific test script.
  • +9/-1     
    first_script.en.md
    Documentation Update for JavaScript Test Execution             

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/getting_started/first_script.en.md

  • Updated the JavaScript tab in the "Running Selenium File" section to
    include a reference to the new instructions for executing a single
    JavaScript test.
  • +1/-1     
    Configuration changes
    package-lock.json
    Addition of package-lock.json File                                             

    package-lock.json

    • Introduced a new package-lock.json file with basic structure.
    +6/-0     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    In selenium documentation, javascript test file execution was missing.
    Therefore, I added that the command to run a test file for javascript
    in "Running Selenium File > JavaScript" section.
    Copy link

    netlify bot commented Apr 7, 2024

    👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

    Visit the deploys page to approve it

    Name Link
    🔨 Latest commit 4810d04

    @CLAassistant
    Copy link

    CLAassistant commented Apr 7, 2024

    CLA assistant check
    All committers have signed the CLA.

    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Apr 7, 2024
    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (c6d76bd)

    Copy link

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the PR involves straightforward documentation updates and a minor change in the package-lock.json file. The changes are clear and limited in scope, making it easy for a reviewer familiar with the project structure and documentation standards.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Incorrect Command Description: The added documentation instructs to use a command to run a "ruby script" in the JavaScript section, which seems to be a copy-paste error. It should be corrected to "Use this command to run a JavaScript test file and follow the first script example."

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Enhancement
    Correct the instruction to accurately describe running a JavaScript test script.

    The command provided for running a JavaScript test script mistakenly refers to executing a
    Ruby script. To avoid confusion and ensure clarity for users trying to run JavaScript
    tests, it's important to correct this instruction to accurately reflect the JavaScript
    context.

    examples/javascript/README.md [33]

    -Use this command to run a ruby script and follow the first script example
    +Use this command to run a JavaScript test script as shown in the first script example
     
    Possible issue
    Verify lockfileVersion compatibility with the npm version used in the project.

    The package-lock.json file has been added with minimal content and specifies a
    lockfileVersion of 3. It's important to ensure that this version is compatible with the
    npm version used in the project to avoid potential conflicts or issues with package
    installations. If the project uses an older version of npm that does not support
    lockfileVersion 3, consider regenerating the package-lock.json with the compatible npm
    version or updating the npm version used in the project.

    package-lock.json [1-6]

     {
       "name": "seleniumhq.github.io",
    -  "lockfileVersion": 3,
    +  "lockfileVersion": 3,  # Ensure compatibility with the npm version used in the project
       "requires": true,
       "packages": {}
     }
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @Sakif-Al-Faruque
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @CLAassistant CLA has been signed from my end. please check.

    @Sakif-Al-Faruque
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    CLA assistant check All committers have signed the CLA.

    please check the CLA contributor sign list

    Copy link
    Member

    @harsha509 harsha509 left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hi @Sakif-Al-Faruque ,

    Thank you for the PR.

    I have requested for few changes, can you look into them!

    Thanks!

    package-lock.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
    @Sakif-Al-Faruque
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Hi @Sakif-Al-Faruque ,

    Thank you for the PR.

    I have requested for few changes, can you look into them!

    Thanks!

    My pleasure to have your opinion.

    @Sakif-Al-Faruque
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Hello, @harsha509 could you please check the last commits ?!

    Copy link
    Member

    @harsha509 harsha509 left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Thank you @Sakif-Al-Faruque for the changes!

    @harsha509 harsha509 merged commit c2299d8 into SeleniumHQ:trunk Apr 8, 2024
    6 checks passed
    @harsha509
    Copy link
    Member

    Congratulations on your first contribution to Selenium Docs @Sakif-Al-Faruque 🎉 🎉 🎉 !

    selenium-ci added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
    * Javascript single test file execution
    
    In selenium documentation, javascript test file execution was missing.
    Therefore, I added that the command to run a test file for javascript
    in "Running Selenium File > JavaScript" section.
    
    * Small correction in examples>javascript>test>README.md
    
    * package-lock.json file has been excluded
    
    * similar changes are added to other translated files
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: Sri Harsha <12621691+harsha509@users.noreply.github.com> c2299d8
    @Sakif-Al-Faruque
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Congratulations on your first contribution to Selenium Docs @Sakif-Al-Faruque 🎉 🎉 🎉 !

    Great! Thank you so much @harsha509. Your important recommendations help me to make it.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 1
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    None yet

    3 participants