-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to Route stats & stacked area plot vs im/export #88
Comments
Skips are invisible. The plots are still blocky. |
Makes sense to me. It's nice to have mostly OK and unrec.
…On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 09:15 Steven Hé (Sīchàng) ***@***.***> wrote:
Skips are invisible. The plots are still blocky.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#88 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACPO52VCRNRB74ATQGGQG3YDNZWDAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7CW7PC2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBRG43TGMRZGU>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
com>
|
—@cunha in #72 (comment) No. Plots here are rasterized. Vector plots with sampling look highly similar except that some lines are slightly thicker. |
Aggregated stats for all RIBs (commit SichangHe/internet_route_verification_meta@abf8a2e). route_all_export_stats.csv |
For all RIBs: Very little changes. |
Update1: Aggregated stats for all RIBs (commit SichangHe/internet_route_verification_meta@796066b). Causes little difference in the plot generated. |
Following #72 after change in special cases.
2.4GiB. Took 3200133ms (53min) on feddev and 22550119ms (376min) on timbersaw.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: