New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: don't throw error if unable to enrich metadata #2608
Conversation
Please hold the review for this PR, as there are some changes that needs to be added by @makeavish and then I will update this PR. |
This PR is ready for review |
@srikanthccv , please have a look at this PR, we can merge it if there are no concerns. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see enrich being used in several places, can we refactor it to add the missing type, datatype at the intial step buildLogsQuery
or somewhere and all the sub functions can safely assume they are set.
Bumping, let me know what you think about the comment. |
Hey @srikanthccv , sorry I missed this. Yes, it makes sense. Even @makeavish suggested something like this that event before the fields reach the parser we can enrich. Let me create a separate issue for that. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was confusing to follow where enrichment is needed vs where it is done. Otherwise LGTM. Please make sure to test it.
Fixes #2601