fix: custom range should be unique to pages #4460
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@YounixM has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
1 similar comment
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/index.tsx (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/index.tsx (3)
- 18-18: The addition of
isObjectfromlodash-esis appropriate for the type checks introduced later in the code. This import enhances the robustness of type validation.- 162-162: Expanding the
updateLocalStorageForRoutesfunction to accept bothTimeandstringtypes increases the function's flexibility. This change allows for more diverse data to be stored, aligning with the PR's objective to handle custom date ranges more effectively. Ensure that all calls to this function are updated accordingly to prevent type mismatches.- 258-260: The approach to store custom date ranges as a stringified JSON object in local storage is a practical solution to handle complex data structures. However, ensure that the parsing and usage of this data elsewhere in the application are handled safely and consider edge cases where the parsing might fail or return unexpected results.
Verification successful
Given the context and the output from the shell script execution, it appears that a manual verification message was echoed without conducting an actual verification of how the application parses and uses the custom date ranges from local storage. To properly address the review comment, we need to verify the application's handling of the stringified JSON object stored in local storage, specifically focusing on its parsing and usage across the application. This involves checking for the presence of code that retrieves, parses, and utilizes this data, and ensuring that there are safeguards against potential issues like parsing failures or unexpected data formats.
To achieve this, we should search the codebase for instances where the local storage data, presumably identified by a specific key related to the
updateLocalStorageForRoutesfunction, is accessed and used. We'll look for JSON parsing operations and their subsequent usage to ensure they are wrapped in try-catch blocks or similar error handling mechanisms to manage parsing errors or invalid data. Additionally, we'll verify if there are checks in place to validate the data structure of the parsed object before its usage.
The verification process has revealed extensive usage of try-catch blocks throughout the application, particularly in API calls and local storage interactions. These blocks are crucial for handling potential errors that could arise during these operations, ensuring the application can gracefully handle exceptions and provide feedback to the user or system about any issues encountered.
In API calls, the try-catch blocks are used to handle errors that may occur during the request to the server or processing of the server's response. This is important for maintaining the stability of the application and providing meaningful error messages to the user or for logging purposes.
For local storage interactions, try-catch blocks are essential for dealing with issues that may arise from browser restrictions, such as the user disabling local storage or the storage quota being exceeded. These blocks ensure that the application can handle these scenarios without crashing or losing functionality.
Overall, the use of try-catch blocks throughout the application is a best practice for error handling, contributing to the robustness and user experience of the application.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the application correctly parses and uses the custom date ranges from local storage. # This script is a placeholder and should be replaced with specific checks relevant to the application's logic. echo "Manual verification needed to ensure safe parsing and usage of custom date ranges from local storage."Length of output: 212
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for instances where local storage data is accessed, focusing on JSON.parse operations and their error handling. rg "localStorage.getItem" --context 5 | grep -i "JSON.parse" # Additionally, check for validation or error handling around these operations. rg "try {.*JSON.parse" --context 5 rg "catch" --context 5Length of output: 211075
vikrantgupta25
force-pushed
the
fix/custom
branch
from
b8176c2
to
83a9319
Compare
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/config.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/index.tsx (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/index.tsx
Additional comments: 1
frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/config.ts (1)
- 105-108: The
TimeRangeinterface strictly requiresstartTimeandendTimeto be strings. This is a good practice for consistency. However, ensure that the format of these strings (e.g., ISO 8601, Unix timestamp) is documented or standardized across the application to avoid confusion or errors in date handling.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/config.ts (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/index.tsx (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/config.ts
- frontend/src/container/TopNav/DateTimeSelection/index.tsx
|
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
Summary
pathname: {startTime: '', endTime: ''}Related Issues / PR's
Screenshots
Screen.Recording.2024-01-30.at.6.38.51.PM.mov
Affected Areas and Manually Tested Areas
Summary by CodeRabbit
DateTimeSelectioncomponent for more robust handling of local storage data, including better support for various data types.updateLocalStorageForRoutesfunction.LocalStorageTimeRangeandTimeRangeinconfig.tsto manage time range data.