Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Added jest cases for logs explorer page #4553

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

vikrantgupta25
Copy link
Collaborator

@vikrantgupta25 vikrantgupta25 commented Feb 15, 2024

Summary

  • added jest test cases for the logs explorer page

Related Issues / PR's

Screenshots

Screenshot 2024-02-16 at 12 17 42 PM

Affected Areas and Manually Tested Areas

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced the Logs Explorer component with specific data-testid attributes for improved testing and visibility.
    • Introduced logsQueryRangeSuccessResponse mock data object for successful log querying, enriching test scenarios.
  • Refactor
    • Optimized import statements in various components for improved code efficiency.
  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive test cases for the Logs Explorer component to ensure reliability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Walkthrough

These updates focus on enhancing the user interface and developer experience for a web application's logging and tracing features. Key improvements include adding data-testid attributes for better testing support, consolidating imports for cleaner code, and introducing mock data for testing log queries. The changes span across various components, demonstrating a concerted effort to make the application more maintainable, testable, and user-friendly.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../LogsExplorerList/index.tsx
.../LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx
.../QueryBuilder/.../LeftToolbarActions.tsx
Added data-testid attributes for improved testing.
.../OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx
.../TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx
Consolidated Typography imports from 'antd'.
.../__mockdata__/logs_query_range.ts Introduced mock data for log querying.
.../LogsExplorer/__tests__/LogsExplorer.test.tsx Added test cases for the Logs Explorer component.

🐰✨
In a land of code and UI,
Where tests and types doth unify,
A rabbit hopped, with glee so high,
"To better code," was its rallying cry.
With data-testids far and wide,
And imports neat, side by side,
It left its mark, did CodeRabbit, with pride.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the chore label Feb 15, 2024
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

@vikrantgupta25 vikrantgupta25 force-pushed the logs-explorer-unit-tests branch 2 times, most recently from eb71ff8 to 2b89576 Compare February 15, 2024 21:49
@vikrantgupta25 vikrantgupta25 changed the title chore: base file for logs explorer jest test cases chore: Added jest cases for logs explorer page Feb 15, 2024
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

2 similar comments
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

@vikrantgupta25 vikrantgupta25 marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 06:51
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 548c531 and f1e7769.
Files selected for processing (7)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerList/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/QueryBuilder/components/ToolbarActions/LeftToolbarActions.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/mocks-server/mockdata/logs_query_range.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/pages/LogsExplorer/tests/LogsExplorer.test.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • frontend/src/container/OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx
Additional comments: 8
frontend/src/mocks-server/__mockdata__/logs_query_range.ts (1)
  • 1-45: The mock data structure for logsQueryRangeSuccessResponse is comprehensive and covers a wide range of data types and scenarios. Ensure that the values and types used here closely mimic real-world data to make the tests as realistic as possible.
frontend/src/container/TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx (1)
  • 1-1: The change to import Typography directly from 'antd' is a good practice for simplifying imports and potentially improving bundle size. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across the codebase for similar imports.
frontend/src/container/QueryBuilder/components/ToolbarActions/LeftToolbarActions.tsx (1)
  • 52-58: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [42-69]

The addition of data-testid attributes to icons for different views is a good practice for improving testability. Ensure that the use of these attributes is consistent across the codebase for similar components.

frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerList/index.tsx (1)
  • 176-178: Wrapping the renderContent inside a div with a data-testid attribute is a good practice for improving testability. Ensure that the use of these attributes is consistent across the codebase for similar components.
frontend/src/pages/LogsExplorer/__tests__/LogsExplorer.test.tsx (1)
  • 1-147: The test cases for the Logs Explorer component are well-structured and follow best practices in testing. Ensure that the mocks used are representative of real-world scenarios and consider adding additional tests for edge cases or scenarios for more comprehensive coverage.
frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx (3)
  • 542-542: The addition of the data-testid="logs-list-view" attribute to the List view button is a good practice for improving testability. This allows for more precise targeting in Jest test cases, facilitating the testing of UI components and interactions.
  • 555-555: The addition of the data-testid="time-series-view" attribute to the Time series button is consistent with the approach taken for the List view button. This consistency is important for maintainability and ensures that test cases can be written in a uniform manner across different view types.
  • 566-566: The addition of the data-testid="table-view" attribute to the Table button follows the same pattern as the previous changes, reinforcing the testability of the component. Consistently applying data-testid attributes across similar UI elements is a best practice that aids in creating reliable and maintainable test cases.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d11c1eb and df09382.
Files selected for processing (7)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerList/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/QueryBuilder/components/ToolbarActions/LeftToolbarActions.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/mocks-server/mockdata/logs_query_range.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/pages/LogsExplorer/tests/LogsExplorer.test.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerList/index.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/QueryBuilder/components/ToolbarActions/LeftToolbarActions.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx
  • frontend/src/mocks-server/mockdata/logs_query_range.ts
  • frontend/src/pages/LogsExplorer/tests/LogsExplorer.test.tsx

Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbf9787 and 446beec.
Files selected for processing (7)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerList/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/QueryBuilder/components/ToolbarActions/LeftToolbarActions.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/container/TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/mocks-server/mockdata/logs_query_range.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/pages/LogsExplorer/tests/LogsExplorer.test.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerList/index.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/LogsExplorerViews/index.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/OptionsMenu/AddColumnField/index.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/QueryBuilder/components/ToolbarActions/LeftToolbarActions.tsx
  • frontend/src/container/TracesExplorer/ListView/utils.tsx
  • frontend/src/mocks-server/mockdata/logs_query_range.ts
  • frontend/src/pages/LogsExplorer/tests/LogsExplorer.test.tsx

Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

@YounixM YounixM merged commit b10f17d into develop Feb 16, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@YounixM YounixM deleted the logs-explorer-unit-tests branch February 16, 2024 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants