Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: redirect old logs routes to new routes #4584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

YounixM
Copy link
Collaborator

@YounixM YounixM commented Feb 22, 2024

redirect old logs routes to new routes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new route for pipeline logs, enhancing navigation and access to pipeline-related information.
  • Refactor
    • Improved route handling to support redirection from old to new routes, ensuring a seamless user experience during navigation updates.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The update introduces a more efficient handling of route redirection for outdated paths and integrates a new private route for pipeline logs. It streamlines the access to pathname within the PrivateRoute component and establishes a mechanism to redirect old routes to their new counterparts, enhancing the application's navigation and user experience.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../AppRoutes/Private.tsx Refactored pathname access, added isOldRoute check, handled redirection for old routes.
.../AppRoutes/routes.ts Added ROUTES.LOGS_PIPELINES route, removed duplicate, introduced oldRoutes, oldNewRoutesMapping.

"In the land of code and sun,
Changes swift, the deed is done.
Routes once old, now swiftly fly,
To new paths beneath the sky.
🐇💻 A rabbit's touch, so light and neat,
Guiding steps with tiny feet.
Through the web, we hop with grace,
In this digital embrace."

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 22, 2024
Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bca847 and c6ab9ac.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/src/AppRoutes/Private.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/AppRoutes/routes.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
frontend/src/AppRoutes/Private.tsx (3)
  • 31-32: Refactoring to directly destructure pathname from useLocation() is a clean and efficient way to access the current route. This change improves readability and reduces the amount of code.
  • 67-67: The introduction of the isOldRoute check is a crucial part of the redirection logic. It efficiently determines if the current route is outdated by checking its presence in the oldRoutes array. This approach is straightforward and effective for the intended purpose.
  • 168-175: The redirection logic for old routes using oldNewRoutesMapping is well-implemented. By creating a new location object with the updated pathname and using history.replace, the application ensures a seamless transition for the user without adding history entries. This approach maintains the user's navigation history clean and focused.
frontend/src/AppRoutes/routes.ts (3)
  • 282-288: Adding the new route for ROUTES.LOGS_PIPELINES with the PipelinePage component and marking it as private (isPrivate: true) is a positive change. It expands the application's functionality and ensures that access is appropriately restricted to authorized users.
  • 356-361: The introduction of the oldRoutes constant is a good practice for managing outdated routes in a centralized manner. This list makes it easier to identify and handle old routes that need redirection, contributing to cleaner and more maintainable code.
  • 363-368: The oldNewRoutesMapping provides a clear and direct mapping between old routes and their new counterparts. This structure is essential for implementing the redirection logic efficiently and ensures that users are seamlessly navigated to the correct new routes. The mapping is well-defined and covers the necessary routes.

@YounixM YounixM force-pushed the redirect-old-logs-explorer-routes-to-new-routes branch from c6ab9ac to cd1b0c7 Compare February 22, 2024 11:03
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3bc1a8 and cd1b0c7.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/src/AppRoutes/Private.tsx (3 hunks)
  • frontend/src/AppRoutes/routes.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • frontend/src/AppRoutes/Private.tsx
  • frontend/src/AppRoutes/routes.ts

Copy link

Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id>

@YounixM YounixM merged commit f2d5d21 into develop Feb 22, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@srikanthccv srikanthccv deleted the redirect-old-logs-explorer-routes-to-new-routes branch April 11, 2024 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants