-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: send only required details in billing events #4587
Conversation
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@YounixM has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughIn a recent update, the handling of user data during event tracking in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- frontend/src/container/BillingContainer/BillingContainer.tsx (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
frontend/src/container/BillingContainer/BillingContainer.tsx (3)
- 16-16: The addition of
lodash-es
for thepick
function is a good choice for selectively sending user details in billing events, enhancing data privacy. Ensure thatlodash-es
is included in the project's dependencies to avoid any runtime errors.- 309-309: The use of
pick
fromlodash-es
to filter theuser
object to include onlyuserId
, andname
is a positive change for data privacy. This aligns with the PR's objective to send only necessary details in billing events. However, it's important to ensure that these fields are sufficient for the intended billing and analytics purposes.- 320-320: Similar to the previous comment, the use of
pick
to filter user details in a different billing event context is consistent and appropriate. This repetition confirms the application's commitment to minimizing the amount of personal information sent during billing events.
Build Error! No Linked Issue found. Please link an issue or mention it in the body using #<issue_id> |
bbef83b
to
cba3665
Compare
Summary
Related Issues / PR's
Screenshots
NA
Affected Areas and Manually Tested Areas
Summary by CodeRabbit