Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change license #95

Closed
jomey opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #96
Closed

Change license #95

jomey opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #96
Labels
Maintenance Code and repository related maintenance

Comments

@jomey
Copy link
Member

jomey commented Jul 28, 2024

Stumbled on this when looking at the effort of @micah-prime to create a conda release (#93)

I propose to change the library license to GNU v3 (https://choosealicense.com/licenses/gpl-3.0/)

Reason:
The current copyright of Copyright "2021 (c) Boise State University SnowEx Hackweek" seems appropriate for the version(s) released back then, but I would like to shift to a more community and open effort.

Any objections or thoughts?
@micahjohnson150 @aaarendt

@jomey jomey added the Maintenance Code and repository related maintenance label Jul 28, 2024
@hpmarshall
Copy link
Member

hpmarshall commented Jul 29, 2024 via email

@micah-prime
Copy link
Contributor

Good call - I think changing the license makes a lot of sense.
I am a fan of the MIT license https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/ generally because I think the "copy left" GNU licenses are likely to be ignored by most folks anyway.

@jomey
Copy link
Member Author

jomey commented Jul 29, 2024

I am a fan of the MIT license https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/ generally because I think the "copy left" GNU licenses are likely to be ignored by most folks anyway.

Agreed that it is a simpler license and most people won't read it anyways. Reason I am advocating for GNU is that we could at least try to have them keep the same license and state the changes. As you said though, this is probably a pipe dream.

You OK with giving GNU a shot?

@micah-prime
Copy link
Contributor

I am a fan of the MIT license https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/ generally because I think the "copy left" GNU licenses are likely to be ignored by most folks anyway.

Agreed that it is a simpler license and most people won't read it anyways. Reason I am advocating for GNU is that we could at least try to have them keep the same license and state the changes. As you said though, this is probably a pipe dream.

You OK with giving GNU a shot?

Sure!

jomey added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2024
@aaarendt
Copy link
Contributor

This works for me considering no others have contributed yet. Seems the right time to make a change.

@jomey jomey closed this as completed in #96 Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Code and repository related maintenance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants