New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Debian package build on aarch64 architecture #232

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@Leden
Contributor

Leden commented May 12, 2016

This adds the code recognizing aarch64 architecture in debian/rules.

@dnobori

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dnobori

dnobori May 26, 2016

Member

Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.

SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch

You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?

Member

dnobori commented May 26, 2016

Your great patch is much appreciated. We are considering to apply your patch into the SoftEther VPN main tree.

SoftEther VPN Patch Acceptance Policy:
http://www.softether.org/5-download/src/9.patch

You have two options which are described on the above policy.
Could you please choose either option 1 or 2, and specify it clearly on the reply?

@Leden

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Leden

Leden May 26, 2016

Contributor

Sure, I choose 1st option. I allow to apply the same patch into PacketiX VPN.

Contributor

Leden commented May 26, 2016

Sure, I choose 1st option. I allow to apply the same patch into PacketiX VPN.

@lingqingfeng

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@lingqingfeng

lingqingfeng Jun 28, 2016

Hi, I am a newcomer.I want to study the Softether VPN. I have read the source code on windows,but It's so complex.Can I apply for a program instruction?Thanks.

Hi, I am a newcomer.I want to study the Softether VPN. I have read the source code on windows,but It's so complex.Can I apply for a program instruction?Thanks.

@paskal

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@paskal

paskal Nov 27, 2016

@Leden, I'm afraid you have to fix something after latest merges.

paskal commented Nov 27, 2016

@Leden, I'm afraid you have to fix something after latest merges.

@dnobori dnobori referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2016

Closed

Is this project DEAD? #268

@dnobori

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dnobori

dnobori Nov 27, 2016

Member

Thank you so much for your contribution to enrich the SoftEther VPN source code.

Your patch has been merged on the main source-tree of SoftEther VPN.

As a token of our gratitude, your GitHub username has been added on the AUTHORS.TXT file and on the header of the related source file.
Please see: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/blob/master/AUTHORS.TXT

Thanks again for your contribution.

Member

dnobori commented Nov 27, 2016

Thank you so much for your contribution to enrich the SoftEther VPN source code.

Your patch has been merged on the main source-tree of SoftEther VPN.

As a token of our gratitude, your GitHub username has been added on the AUTHORS.TXT file and on the header of the related source file.
Please see: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/blob/master/AUTHORS.TXT

Thanks again for your contribution.

@Leden

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Leden

Leden Nov 27, 2016

Contributor

@paskal sure, i'll look into it as soon as i get a free minute.

Contributor

Leden commented Nov 27, 2016

@paskal sure, i'll look into it as soon as i get a free minute.

@paskal

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@paskal

paskal Nov 27, 2016

@dnobori, you've mentioned this pull request as merged but didn't merged it actually.

paskal commented Nov 27, 2016

@dnobori, you've mentioned this pull request as merged but didn't merged it actually.

@Leden

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@Leden

Leden Nov 27, 2016

Contributor

@paskal, it is merged, in fact. The code itself seems to be copied onto the master branch manually. It's fine, this PR is not needed anymore. I'll close it.

Contributor

Leden commented Nov 27, 2016

@paskal, it is merged, in fact. The code itself seems to be copied onto the master branch manually. It's fine, this PR is not needed anymore. I'll close it.

@Leden Leden closed this Nov 27, 2016

@Leden Leden deleted the Leden:aarch64 branch Dec 22, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment