Update of Python microservice example #2199
Conversation
|
Preview available here |
I added @jochenendres and @mgrumann from the responsible team, but regarding Python I have no clue. |
Added logging so that some output can be seen in the Admin app, bumped to recent manifest version, advertised automated authentication.
|
Thanks ... @jochenendres @mgrumann Feel free to nominate someone else. I noticed a little cosmetic issue, not sure if that would be a one liner fix or more involved: The microservice proxies reports authentication errors differently from the normal REST endpoints. You get an "internalError" reported, which shouldn't be the case if you just leave out the credentials ... |
Co-authored-by: BeateRixen <90445236+BeateRixen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BeateRixen <90445236+BeateRixen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BeateRixen <90445236+BeateRixen@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
||
| * Is a multi-tenant microservice, which means that it runs only once even if many customers are subscribed to it. | ||
| * Has two replicas as required for highly available production microservices. Note: For development purposes where high availability is not required, you can set this to one replica only. | ||
| * Has so-called liveness and readiness probes that {{< product-c8y-iot >}} uses to check if your microservice is healthy and can run. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For my understanding: with this framework , should the customer implement the /health endpoint? If yes, maybe a hint mentioning it here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, I merged the PR already before your comment. I updated the text, but the change will only go into the next PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No problem. I have not noticed that it has been merged :) probably it was done while I was reviewing it.
I took the liberty and rewrote the text a little. My main goals are:
I'll still create PRs for the cumulocity-examples and c8y_microservice-python.
@BeateRixen Do you happen to know who the SME for reviewing this could be?