Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Secure Connections Standard #548

Open
wants to merge 36 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #547

@markus-hentsch markus-hentsch added the SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10 label Apr 4, 2024
@markus-hentsch markus-hentsch changed the title Add Secure Communication Standard Add Secure Connections Standard Apr 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@josephineSei josephineSei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice first draft - I have a few questions inline

Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@markus-hentsch markus-hentsch marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2024 12:25
@bitkeks bitkeks self-requested a review April 10, 2024 08:38
@martinmo
Copy link
Member

@markus-hentsch I have general remark: Because TLS configuration and security is a moving target, have you considered to base the recommended configuration on one of the profiles offered by Mozilla SSL? For example, the "intermediate" profile, see https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/ and https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS. (AFAIK, these can be checked with sslyze.)

@artificial-intelligence
Copy link
Contributor

@markus-hentsch I have general remark: Because TLS configuration and security is a moving target, have you considered to base the recommended configuration on one of the profiles offered by Mozilla SSL? For example, the "intermediate" profile, see https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/ and https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS. (AFAIK, these can be checked with sslyze.)

lol, I had the same idea and actually checked our haproxy TLS implementation, seems there is some opportunity to do some hardening there:

COMPLIANCE AGAINST MOZILLA TLS CONFIGURATION
 --------------------------------------------

    Checking results against Mozilla's "MozillaTlsConfigurationEnum.INTERMEDIATE" configuration. See https://ssl-config.mozilla.org/ for more details.

    a.regiocloud.tech:443: FAILED - Not compliant.
        * ciphers: Cipher suites {'TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA', 'TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384', 'TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA', 'TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256'} are supported, but should be rejected.

@artificial-intelligence
Copy link
Contributor

working on a fix for upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/2060787

@anjastrunk anjastrunk self-requested a review April 15, 2024 07:21
Copy link
Contributor

@anjastrunk anjastrunk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some minor cosmetic changes:

  • Is prefer to write Cloud Service Provider instead of CSP, as "CSP" is not an official abbreviation
  • I do not like writing "SCS proposes..", "SCS decides...". AFAIK, SCS stands for Sovereign Cloud Stack, which is a Software Stack, which cannot decide something. I prefer to write "SCS project" or "SCS community"

But again. This is just cosmetics.

@markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just some minor cosmetic changes:

* Is prefer to write Cloud Service Provider instead of CSP, as "CSP" is not an official abbreviation

* I do not like writing "SCS proposes..", "SCS decides...". AFAIK, SCS stands for Sovereign Cloud Stack, which is a Software Stack, which cannot decide something. I prefer to write "SCS project" or "SCS community"

But again. This is just cosmetics.

I adjusted the SCS references. I left "CSP" as-is and added a glossary instead, like I did with some other standards. We seem to use CSP a lot in other standards so I'd like to stay consistent. The glossary at the top should introduce the abbreviation sufficiently now.

Copy link
Contributor

@josephineSei josephineSei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall I think this is a good starting point. We need something for the manual audits, but this may something to discuss in the standards SIG or in the IAM and Security Meeting

Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-0114-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@artificial-intelligence artificial-intelligence left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for all the work done so far on this.

Unfortunately I think there's still some work left to do.

Thanks.

Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated standard and test script to use the Mozilla TLS "intermediate" preset now.

Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
- version: v5
standards:
- name: Secure Connections
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SovereignCloudStack/standards/main/Standards/scs-01XX-v1-secure-connections.md
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: URL needs update as soon as number is stable

Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Hentsch <markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com>
@markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

I updated the standard and removed the concrete config options from the RabbitMQ and Apache Kafka sections. Config snippets like these are hard to keep up-to-date in a standard. I placed links to documentation there instead.

@markus-hentsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@artificial-intelligence this is still marked as "requested changes" by you. Was there anything left from your review that I didn't address yet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Secure communication standard for IaaS infastructure
6 participants