Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Go layer to reflect vim-go var name change #1719

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2018

Conversation

pkazmier
Copy link
Contributor

PR Prelude

Thank you for working on SpaceVim! :)

Please complete these steps and check these boxes (by putting an x inside
the brackets) before filing your PR:

  • I have read and understood SpaceVim's CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have read and understood SpaceVim's CODE_OF_CONDUCT document.
  • I have included tests for the changes in my PR. If not, I have included a
    rationale for why I haven't.
  • I understand my PR may be closed if it becomes obvious I didn't
    actually perform all of these steps.

Why this change is necessary and useful

vim-go renamed go_highlight_methods to go_highlight_function_calls recently to address confusion with the way the existing variable names behaved. This change will re-enable the higlighting of function and method invocations, which is currently broken. Although I've decided to not use spacevim, I thought others would benefit from the fix.

No tests are included as I don't see any existing framework to test the existing layer.

vim-go renamed go_highlight_methods to go_highlight_function_calls
recently to address confusion with the way the existing variable names
behaved [1]. This change will re-enable the higlighting of function and
method _invocations_.

[1] fatih/vim-go#1557 (comment)
@pkazmier pkazmier requested a review from wsdjeg as a code owner May 12, 2018 15:00
@wsdjeg wsdjeg merged commit 46a6722 into SpaceVim:master May 13, 2018
@wsdjeg
Copy link
Member

wsdjeg commented May 13, 2018

Thanks, merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants