Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taxon determinations on Collection Objects displaying in wrong "order" #1355

Closed
tmcelrath opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 14 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bug An existing function is broken.

Comments

@tmcelrath
Copy link

Describe the bug
If I add two determinations with two different years, the most recent determination should be the one displayed as "current"

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. When I add two determinations.
  2. Then I add the older one second.
  3. Then the older one is displayed, not the most "current" one.

Example
image

Expected behavior
Determinations should "rank" based on age.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Environment (please identify where you experience this bug:
*** One of ***

  • Production
  • Chrome
@tmcelrath tmcelrath added the bug An existing function is broken. label Mar 6, 2020
@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Mar 6, 2020

You must drag the preferred determination to the top of the list. It is not based on age.

@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

Am I missing something? I can't drag them.

@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Mar 6, 2020 via email

@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

Should I edit issue to "Can't change determination order"?

@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Mar 6, 2020 via email

@mjy mjy added this to ready in Specimen digitization Apr 24, 2020
@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Sep 15, 2020

@jlpereira You did something with positoin, is this resolved?

@jlpereira
Copy link
Member

@mjy if I remember well there was some issue at the backend

@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

This is not resolved. Still an issue.

@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

Please fix ASAP

@proceps proceps added this to Discussion Priority in Priority Roadmap May 23, 2022
@jlpereira
Copy link
Member

jlpereira commented Aug 22, 2023

@tmcelrath this is still an issue? since Browse collection object was refactored, maybe it's already fixed. Could you let us know?

@mjy mjy self-assigned this Aug 22, 2023
@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

Still an issue. Still not using the most recent one as the "current" identification.

@tmcelrath
Copy link
Author

That same CO is still a good example. Only using the older identification for display and for export to DWC.

@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Aug 22, 2023

Only using the older identification for display and for export to DWC.

I rememver, this multiple issues.

  • Allow curator to update position of Determinations (top is current)
  • Replace call to /collection_objects/123/dwca with /collection_objects/123/dwc?rebuild=true` (fully deprecate throught)
    • Browse collection object
    • others?!
  • Refresh object label (in header) on Comprehensive if Determination changes because new top record
  • Ensure top curation is exported to DWC
    • Requires full nuke/rebuild at this time
  • Restore date column to comprehensive (order is correct there AFAICT)

@mjy
Copy link
Member

mjy commented Oct 6, 2023

We think we have it now.

@mjy mjy closed this as completed Oct 6, 2023
Priority Roadmap automation moved this from Discussion Priority to Done Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug An existing function is broken.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants