[Feature] Support function next_day

[mlimwxxnn]

What type of PR is this：

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Which issues of this PR fixes ：

Fixes #19553

Problem Summary(Required) ：

NEW FUNCTION: next_day

Test sql:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `next_day_test` (
  `d1` DATE,
  `d2` DATETIME
) 
DISTRIBUTED BY HASH(`d1`) 
PROPERTIES(
  "replication_num" = "1"
);

INSERT INTO `next_day_test`(d1, d2)
VALUES ('2023-04-01', '2023-04-01 20:13:14'),
       ('2023-04-02', '2023-04-02 20:13:14'),
       ('2023-04-03', '2023-04-03 20:13:14'),
       ('2023-04-04', '2023-04-04 20:13:14'),
       ('2023-04-05', '2023-04-05 20:13:14'),
       ('2023-04-06', '2023-04-06 20:13:14'),
       ('2023-04-07', '2023-04-07 20:13:14');

SELECT next_day('2023-04-05', 'Mo');
SELECT next_day('2023-04-05', 'Tue');
SELECT next_day('2023-04-05', 'Wednesday');
SELECT next_day('2023-04-05 20:13:14', 'Thursday');


SELECT d1, next_day(d1, 'Fr'), d2, next_day(d2, 'Fr') FROM next_day_test;
SELECT d1, next_day(d1, 'Sat'), d2, next_day(d2,'Sat') FROM next_day_test;
SELECT d1, next_day(d1, 'Sunday'), d2, next_day(d2, 'Sunday') FROM next_day_test;

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr will affect users' behaviors
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto backported to target branch
  • 3.0
  • 2.5
  • 2.4
  • 2.3

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[imay]

you also need to sign off this PR by git commit -s

[mlimwxxnn]

I have commit with sign but DCO check also failed.

[imay]

1. you need to run build-support/clang-format.sh to format the cpp source files.
2. If the last commit has sign-off, DCO will be happy then.

[fzhedu]

please add more tests:

1. abnormal tests, for example the data fromat or dow format is not right;
2. some special tests, like 2/29 or 2/28 in LEAP year or not.

[fzhedu]

3. inputs with null

[ZiheLiu]

And add some test cases, where the second parameter DOW is from table not a constant value.

[mlimwxxnn]

1.abnormal tests
2.special tests (LEAP year, LEAP month)
3.null
4.DOW is from table (date and dow from same/different table)
I have added the above cases to the test.

[fzhedu]

pleas add doc