Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix synchronized materialized view with upper column names #31505

Merged

Conversation

LiShuMing
Copy link
Contributor

@LiShuMing LiShuMing commented Sep 20, 2023

Fix #31504

  • synchronized materialized view should be case sensitive for base table's column names.

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 21, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 4 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
1.7% 1.7% Duplication

@wanpengfei-git
Copy link
Collaborator

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

😍 pass : 7 / 7 (100.00%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 com/starrocks/sql/ast/CreateMaterializedViewStmt.java 7 7 100.00% []

@wanpengfei-git
Copy link
Collaborator

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

😍 pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

@mofeiatwork mofeiatwork enabled auto-merge (squash) October 9, 2023 02:10
@kangkaisen kangkaisen merged commit 151dd89 into StarRocks:main Oct 10, 2023
38 checks passed
@wanpengfei-git
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.2 label Oct 10, 2023
@wanpengfei-git
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.1 label Oct 10, 2023
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 10, 2023

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 10, 2023

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…31505)

Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 151dd89)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2023
…31505)

Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 151dd89)
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2023
…31505)

Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 151dd89)
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2023
…31505)

Signed-off-by: shuming.li <ming.moriarty@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 151dd89)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Result of synchronized materialized view with upper column names of the base table is wrong
6 participants