Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Not ignore the leading space when parse delete predicate value #39797

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 25, 2024

Conversation

wyb
Copy link
Contributor

@wyb wyb commented Jan 23, 2024

Why I'm doing:
k1 is varchar key column, and delete from tbl where k1 = " a" success.
the delete predicate will be parsed as k1 = "a" when quering, so the data is not really deleted.

What I'm doing:
parse the predicate value correctly.

Fixes #issue

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

k1 is varchar key column, and delete from tbl where k1 = " a" success.
the delete predicate will be parsed as k1 = "a" when quering, so the data is not really deleted.

Signed-off-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

// group1: ([^\0=<>!\*]{1,64}) matches "c1"
// group2: ((?:=)|(?:!=)|(?:>>)|(?:<<)|(?:>=)|(?:<=)|(?:\*=)|(?:IS)) matches "="
// group3: ((?:[\s\S]+)?) matches "1597751948193618247 and length(source)<1;\n;\n"
// group3: ((?:[\s\S]+)?) matches " 1597751948193618247 and length(source)<1;\n;\n"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

out of curious, why use string to save sub conditions instead of a well defined structure, e.g. pb to save this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

historical reason, and pb is used in cloud native table.

@sduzh sduzh merged commit e3d5ab0 into StarRocks:main Jan 25, 2024
47 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.2 label Jan 25, 2024
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.1 label Jan 25, 2024
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.0

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 25, 2024

backport branch-3.2

✅ Backports have been created

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.0 label Jan 25, 2024
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-2.5

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 25, 2024

backport branch-3.1

✅ Backports have been created

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 2.5 label Jan 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 25, 2024

backport branch-3.0

✅ Backports have been created

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jan 25, 2024

backport branch-2.5

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (#39797)

Signed-off-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e3d5ab0)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (#39797)

Signed-off-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e3d5ab0)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (#39797)

Signed-off-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e3d5ab0)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (#39797)

Signed-off-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit e3d5ab0)

# Conflicts:
#	be/test/storage/delete_handler_test.cpp
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (backport #39797) (#39927)

Co-authored-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (backport #39797) (#39928)

Co-authored-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (backport #39797) (#39929)

Co-authored-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
wyb added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
…ue (backport #39797) (#39930)

Co-authored-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
Seaven pushed a commit to Seaven/starrocks that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
…ue (StarRocks#39797)

Signed-off-by: wyb <wybb86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants