Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix struct ordinal index error #44608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Seaven
Copy link
Contributor

@Seaven Seaven commented Apr 23, 2024

Why I'm doing:

access_iters[0] may doesn't read data when use late_materializa, so the ordinal index is error

What I'm doing:

Follow: #44294

Fixes https://github.com/StarRocks/StarRocksTest/issues/7150

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
@Seaven Seaven requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2024 09:28
@mergify mergify bot assigned Seaven Apr 23, 2024
Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

fail : 8 / 12 (66.67%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 be/src/storage/rowset/struct_column_iterator.cpp 8 12 66.67% [263, 269, 270, 271]

kangkaisen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit d3ccad5)

# Conflicts:
#	be/src/storage/rowset/struct_column_iterator.cpp
Seaven added a commit to Seaven/starrocks that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Seaven added a commit to Seaven/starrocks that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
kangkaisen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
@kangkaisen kangkaisen merged commit 94f8067 into StarRocks:main Apr 24, 2024
79 of 84 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Apr 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Apr 24, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 94f8067)
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants