smurf: some preliminary code for applying MCE response to fakemap data

This is sort-of correct, but realistically the fake signal should have
the filter applied prior to adding to the real data. This is good enough
though if you just want to see what the effect is for *only* the fake
source.

applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_iteratemap.c

@@ -385,6 +385,8 @@
 *        smf_calcmodel_flt). This is controlled by new config parameter FLT.UNDOFIRST.
 *     2012-10-22 (DSB):
 *        If ( abs(itermaps) > 1 ) then include a quality component in each itermap.
+*     2012-11-20 (EC):
+*        Add some commented-out code to apply the MCE response to fakemap data
 *     {enter_further_changes_here}
 
 *  Notes:
@@ -1450,6 +1452,22 @@ void smf_iteratemap( ThrWorkForce *wf, const Grp *igrp, const Grp *iterrootgrp,
               }
             }
           }
+
+          {
+            /* Apply the response function of the MCE. Really, instead of
+               convolving with the response after adding the fakemap signal
+               to the time-series, we should be filtering it BEFORE adding
+               (since the real data have already been filtered by this
+               response). */
+            /*
+            smfFilter *filt = smf_create_smfFilter(res[0]->sdata[idx], status);
+            smf_filter_mce( filt, 1, status );
+            smf_update_quality( res[0]->sdata[idx], 1, NULL, 0, 0.05, status );
+            smf_filter_execute( wf, res[0]->sdata[idx], filt, 0, 0, status );
+            filt = smf_free_smfFilter( filt, status );
+            */
+          }
+
         }
       }