docs: update benchmarks

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Dygalo <dmitry@dygalo.dev>
Stranger6667 · Apr 1, 2024 · 47e1ae6 · 47e1ae6
1 parent b912ab5
commit 47e1ae6
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 4 changed files with 24 additions and 24 deletions.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -238,14 +238,14 @@ Caching is disabled by default.
 
 `css-inline` typically inlines HTML emails within hundreds of microseconds, though results may vary with input complexity.
 
-Benchmarks for `css-inline==0.13.0`:
+Benchmarks for `css-inline==0.14.0`:
 
-- Basic: **6.29 µs**, 230 bytes
-- Realistic-1: **127.72 µs**, 8.58 KB
-- Realistic-2: **82.74 µs**, 4.3 KB
-- GitHub page: **227.76 ms**, 1.81 MB
+- Basic: **6.72 µs**, 230 bytes
+- Realistic-1: **132.59 µs**, 8.58 KB
+- Realistic-2: **86.01 µs**, 4.3 KB
+- GitHub page: **228.97 ms**, 1.81 MB
 
-These benchmarks, conducted using `rustc 1.75.0`, can be found in `css-inline/benches/inliner.rs`.
+These benchmarks, conducted using `rustc 1.77.1`, can be found in `css-inline/benches/inliner.rs`.
 
 ## Command Line Interface
 

diff --git a/bindings/javascript/README.md b/bindings/javascript/README.md
@@ -217,15 +217,15 @@ Most of the time it achieves over a **3x** speed advantage compared to the next
 
 Here is the performance comparison:
 
-|             | Size    | `css-inline 0.13.0` | `css-inline-wasm 0.13.0` | `juice 10.0.0`       | `inline-css 4.0.2`   |
-|-------------|---------|---------------------|--------------------------|----------------------|----------------------|
-| Basic       | 230 B   | 15.34 µs            | 19.99 µs (**1.30x**)     | 56.70 µs (**3.69x**) | 67.95 µs (**4.42x**) |
-| Realistic-1 | 8.58 KB | 333.22 µs           | 434.59 µs (**1.30x**)    | 1.07 ms (**3.23x**)  | 1.24 ms (**3.73x**)  |
-| Realistic-2 | 4.3 KB  | 195.80 µs           | 261.09 µs (**1.33x**)    | 0.99 ms (**5.10x**)  | 0.76 ms (**3.90x**)  |
+|             | Size    | `css-inline 0.14.0` | `css-inline-wasm 0.13.0` | `juice 10.0.0`        | `inline-css 4.0.2`   |
+|-------------|---------|---------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|
+| Basic       | 230 B   | 16.82 µs            | 20.92 µs (**1.24x**)     | 57.00 µs (**3.38x**)  | 68.43 µs (**4.06x**) |
+| Realistic-1 | 8.58 KB | 351.74 µs           | 452.28 µs (**1.28x**)    | 859.10 µs (**2.44x**) | 1.04 ms (**2.98x**)  |
+| Realistic-2 | 4.3 KB  | 203.25 µs           | 269.54 µs (**1.32x**)    | 1.02 ms (**5.04x**)   | 861.32 µs (**4.23x**)  |
 
 The "Basic" case was obtained from benchmarking the example from the Usage section.
 
-The benchmarking code is available in the `benches/bench.ts` file. The benchmarks were conducted using the stable `rustc 1.75.0` on Node.js `v21.1.0`.
+The benchmarking code is available in the `benches/bench.ts` file. The benchmarks were conducted using the stable `rustc 1.77.1` on Node.js `v21.1.0`.
 
 ## License
 

diff --git a/bindings/python/README.md b/bindings/python/README.md
@@ -237,17 +237,17 @@ Most of the time it achieves over a **10x** speed advantage compared to the next
 
 Here is the performance comparison:
 
-|             | Size    | `css_inline 0.13.0` | `premailer 3.10.0`     | `toronado 0.1.0`       | `inlinestyler 0.2.5`   | `pynliner 0.8.0`       |
-|-------------|---------|---------------------|------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
-| Basic       | 230 B   | 6.54 µs             | 126.95 µs (**19.41x**) | 653.12 µs (**99.85x**) | 1.02 ms (**157.14x**)  | 1.17ms (**179.91x**)   |
-| Realistic-1 | 8.58 KB | 133.87 µs           | 1.41 ms (**10.60x**)   | 15.85 ms (**118.39x**) | 26.48 ms (**197.86x**) | 51.56 ms (**385.18x**) |
-| Realistic-2 | 4.3 KB  | 85.41 µs            | 2.65 ms (**31.09x**)   | ERROR                  | 17.68 ms (**207.07x**) | ERROR                  |
-| GitHub page | 1.81 MB | 229.02 ms           | 24.73 s (**108.02x**)  | ERROR                  | ERROR                  | ERROR                  |
+|             | Size    | `css_inline 0.14.0` | `premailer 3.10.0`     | `toronado 0.1.0`        | `inlinestyler 0.2.5`   | `pynliner 0.8.0`       |
+|-------------|---------|---------------------|------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|
+| Basic       | 230 B   | 6.79 µs             | 130.25 µs (**19.18x**) | 683.04 µs (**100.58x**) | 1.06 ms (**157.10x**)  | 1.21ms (**178.61x**)   |
+| Realistic-1 | 8.58 KB | 135.37 µs           | 1.40 ms (**10.38x**)   | 16.29 ms (**120.37x**)  | 26.64 ms (**196.82x**) | 52.36 ms (**386.85x**) |
+| Realistic-2 | 4.3 KB  | 85.41 µs            | 2.70 ms (**31.70x**)   | ERROR                   | 17.57 ms (**205.73x**) | ERROR                  |
+| GitHub page | 1.81 MB | 230.63 ms           | 24.32 s (**105.45x**)  | ERROR                   | ERROR                  | ERROR                  |
 
 The "Basic" case was obtained from benchmarking the example from the Usage section.
 Note that the `toronado`, `inlinestyler` and `pynliner` libraries both encountered errors when used to inline CSS in the last scenario.
 
-The benchmarking code is available in the `benches/bench.py` file. The benchmarks were conducted using the stable `rustc 1.75.0` on Python `3.11.7`.
+The benchmarking code is available in the `benches/bench.py` file. The benchmarks were conducted using the stable `rustc 1.77.1` on Python `3.11.7`.
 
 ## Comparison with other libraries
 

diff --git a/bindings/ruby/README.md b/bindings/ruby/README.md
@@ -210,15 +210,15 @@ It consistently outperforms `premailer`, offering speed increases often exceedin
 
 The table below provides a detailed comparison between `css_inline` and `premailer` when inlining CSS into an HTML document (like in the Usage section above):
 
-|                   | Size    | `css_inline 0.13.0` | `premailer 1.21.0 with Nokogiri 1.15.2`        | Difference |
+|                   | Size    | `css_inline 0.14.0` | `premailer 1.21.0 with Nokogiri 1.15.2`        | Difference |
 |-------------------|---------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------|
-| Basic usage       | 230 B   | 7.79 µs             | 417.56 µs                                      | **53.57x** |
-| Realistic email 1 | 8.58 KB | 149.56 µs           | 9.73 ms                                        | **65.07x** |
-| Realistic email 2 | 4.3 KB  | 93.19 µs            | Error: Cannot parse 0 calc((100% - 500px) / 2) | -          |
+| Basic usage       | 230 B   | 8.82 µs             | 417.84 µs                                      | **47.37x** |
+| Realistic email 1 | 8.58 KB | 160.37 µs           | 10.15 ms                                       | **63.32x** |
+| Realistic email 2 | 4.3 KB  | 102.88 µs           | Error: Cannot parse 0 calc((100% - 500px) / 2) | -          |
 | GitHub Page       | 1.81 MB | 237.03 ms           | 3.02 s                                         | **12.78x** |
 
 Please refer to the `test/bench.rb` file to review the benchmark code.
-The results displayed above were measured using stable `rustc 1.75.0` on Ruby `3.2.2`.
+The results displayed above were measured using stable `rustc 1.77.1` on Ruby `3.2.2`.
 
 ## Further reading