-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Execute command in all repos #31
Comments
Hi, I have made something like you want : https://github.com/CoppernicSoftware/gws/tree/bp-dev It is the command At least it could be a good start for you. |
@bastienpaulfr Thanks for sharing your solution! @JohanSpaedtke However, I'm going to invoke the README:
and declare this a wontfix. This is easy enough to as a bash one-liner like
|
@emlun By the way, the README is not the law [1] 😄 so if you want to implement this kind of behaviour feel free to do so. I didn't wanted to put potentially destructive operations as part of the gws commands, as it would imply that they are supported safely. But having a «gws exe -- command» that only run commands the users want to run, in all repositories managed by gws, would actually be nice. The users would be responsible by themself of potentially destructive operations 😈 . |
Well, I don't want to implement it.... 😇 Like you I'm not that excited by
the prospect of developing in bash. Bug fixes and minor improvements are
one thing, but I'm reluctant to develop new features.
…On Sat, 10 Jun 2017, 18:31 Fabien Dubosson, ***@***.***> wrote:
@emlun <https://github.com/emlun> By the way, the README is not the law
[1] 😄 so if you want to implement this kind of behaviour feel free to do
so. I didn't wanted to put potentially destructive operations as part of
the gws commands, as it would imply that they are supported safely. But
having a «gws exe -- command» that only run commands the users want to run,
in all repositories managed by gws, would actually be nice. The users would
be responsible by themself of potentially destructive operations 😈 .
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GMkuPiIZ2k
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#31 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABTezh4fHFAECcU9XZdHeKUQPRLzHI4tks5sCsTFgaJpZM4NjwvR>
.
|
Well that one liner could replace most of gws ;P But I understand why you don't want to do it :) |
No idea if you think this is in scope for gws or not but i would like to do the following
gws run "mvn clean"
and have that run the command
mvn clean
in all repos. Please just close if you think this is a stupid idea and then I'll just create my own little script for it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: