-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make imagePullPolicy and latest tag explicit for now #77
Make imagePullPolicy and latest tag explicit for now #77
Conversation
Now that we got rid of `latest` tag, we can optimize for already having pulled a given version of a docker image
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since technically we tag our release with version 0.0.0
, should we explicitly pull version 0.0.0
until we start tagging with actual versions? This would help remind us not to use the latest
tag in the future
Do we overwrite the previous tagged image |
Yeah since we didn't start tagging anything we've been overriding the version |
In retrospect it would've been better to start incrementing much sooner, so we have a history of changes... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm in case you tested it out.
FWIW, images can have multiple tags and it is really nice if at least one
of them is the first 7 or 8 chars of the git commit Sha.
…On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 5:32 PM Lei Huang ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
lgtm in case you tested it out.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#77?email_source=notifications&email_token=ALSRZWL3OUGPS3VTJ6CPUR3P7ZSB3A5CNFSM4IEIUY62YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOB6UUXPQ#pullrequestreview-262753214>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALSRZWN47DUKVBPQ37WR3HTP7ZSB3ANCNFSM4IEIUY6Q>
.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Once we get into a proper release cycle, it would be good to include part of the SHA as @blaise-sumo points out its pretty standard. We will also need to udpate ImagePullPolicy to ifNotPresent once we do full release cycles.
* Add ad group resource * Ad group to advertising role * local -> var * Actually fix name var * Add ad groups to roles * new line * Unique names for terraform ad group resources
Until we start tagging our
sumologic/kubernetes-fluentd
releases, we should be explicit about theAlways
imagePullPolicy and0.0.0
tag.Once we start tagging, we can change this to: