-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LFS support for renga run #116
Conversation
6bec0d3
to
c89f7df
Compare
renga/cli/init.py
Outdated
@@ -68,12 +68,13 @@ def store_directory(ctx, param, value): | |||
exists=True, writable=True, file_okay=False, resolve_path=True)) | |||
@click.option('--name', callback=validate_name) | |||
@click.option('--force', is_flag=True) | |||
@click.option('--lfs/--nolfs', is_flag=True, default=True) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
--lfs/--no-lfs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we remove mentions of LFS from the method names? I would propose to use technology agnostic name like "object store(-age)" or "file store(-age)".
waiting on #115 before adding the integration for datasets
addresses #104