Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#12588] Improve test code coverage of CopySessionModalComponent #12616

Merged

Conversation

Astrid641
Copy link
Contributor

@Astrid641 Astrid641 commented Oct 21, 2023

Part of #12588

Outline of Solution

Add test for the 'copy' method and improve the test for 'select' method from partial covered to all covered for CopySessionModalComponent.

…od from partial covered to all covered for CopySessionModalComponent.
…ponent' into add-tests-to-CopySessionModalComponent

# Conflicts:
#	src/web/app/components/copy-session-modal/copy-session-modal.component.spec.ts
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi @Astrid641, thank you for your interest in contributing to TEAMMATES!
However, your PR does not appear to follow our contribution guidelines:

  • Description must reference the issue number the PR is fixing, e.g. Fixes #<issue-number> (or Part of #<issue-number> if the PR does not address the issue fully)

Please address the above before we proceed to review your PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@cedricongjh cedricongjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you for the PR, just one comment!

@cedricongjh cedricongjh added the s.ToReview The PR is waiting for review(s) label Oct 21, 2023
@cedricongjh cedricongjh self-assigned this Oct 21, 2023
@Astrid641
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changes made

Copy link
Contributor

@cedricongjh cedricongjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you for the PR!

@cedricongjh cedricongjh added s.FinalReview The PR is ready for final review and removed s.ToReview The PR is waiting for review(s) labels Oct 22, 2023
@nusoss-bot
Copy link

Folks, This PR seems to be stalling (no activities for the past 7 days). 🐌 😢
Hope someone can get it to move forward again soon...

@nusoss-bot
Copy link

Folks, This PR seems to be stalling (no activities for the past 7 days). 🐌 😢
Hope someone can get it to move forward again soon...

@nusoss-bot
Copy link

Folks, This PR seems to be stalling (no activities for the past 9 days). 🐌 😢
Hope someone can get it to move forward again soon...

Copy link
Contributor

@weiquu weiquu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@weiquu weiquu removed the request for review from jasonqiu212 November 30, 2023 07:37
@weiquu weiquu added s.ToMerge The PR is approved by all reviewers including final reviewer; ready for merging and removed s.FinalReview The PR is ready for final review labels Nov 30, 2023
@weiquu weiquu merged commit 968ff77 into TEAMMATES:master Nov 30, 2023
9 checks passed
@wkurniawan07 wkurniawan07 added this to the V8.30.0 milestone Jan 21, 2024
@wkurniawan07 wkurniawan07 added the c.Task Other non-user-facing works, e.g. refactoring, adding tests label Jan 21, 2024
cedricongjh pushed a commit to cedricongjh/teammates that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
…nent (TEAMMATES#12616)

* commit to checkout

* Add test for the 'copy' method and improve the test for 'select' method from partial covered to all covered for CopySessionModalComponent.

* remove blank line

* add new line at the end of file

* removed the old test which running error in CI test

* revert the change of  spec.ts.snap

---------

Co-authored-by: Wei Qing <48304907+weiquu@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c.Task Other non-user-facing works, e.g. refactoring, adding tests s.ToMerge The PR is approved by all reviewers including final reviewer; ready for merging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants