Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Misc #12

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 31, 2015
Merged

Misc #12

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 31, 2015

Conversation

gperciva
Copy link
Member

BTW, would you prefer a whole bunch of tiny branches (i.e. a different branch, and therefore merge, for each of these commits), or should I continue to dump small misc stuff together?

@cperciva
Copy link
Member

I'd say as a general rule a branch should be either one functional change or one or more single-commit functional changes. I'm just thinking about how I review changes here -- if there are multiple related commits on a branch and other changes as well, then neither "look at individual commits" nor "look at the diff for the entire branch" will work.

@gperciva gperciva force-pushed the misc branch 4 times, most recently from 4ed2281 to d25d305 Compare July 11, 2015 21:38
When trying to do:
    tarsnap -c --dry-run ~/backup/
Previously the code complained about
    tarsnap: Cannot create an archive with an empty name

By changing the default to "(dry-run)", it runs quite happily.
This includes running mdoc2man.sh
@gperciva
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry for the multiple uploads. The --dry-run commit is ready for another look.

@gperciva gperciva force-pushed the misc branch 2 times, most recently from b100807 to d56f320 Compare July 30, 2015 18:28
@gperciva
Copy link
Member Author

ok, this latest version (92d5c36) should be good.

cperciva added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2015
@cperciva cperciva merged commit b05eed2 into master Jul 31, 2015
@gperciva gperciva deleted the misc branch July 31, 2015 00:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants