GT-Warmup-Cooldown

[jkostiuk]

Warmups and Cooldowns for GT, further addressing TeamBasedInquiryLearning/library#28.

Meta note: I'm still open to suggestions for a different name other than cooldown.

Let me know when/were I should be contributing some text to explain to instructors what these things are.

[StevenClontz]

Re "cooldown": "Looking ahead" has stuck in my mind.

[jkostiuk]

hmmm..."looking ahead" implies an element of "preview" in the activities, which isn't necessarily true.

How do you feel about "Checking In" or "Self-Assessment"?

The main purpose of these activities is for students to see if they really have it, or need to do a little more review, etc.

[siwelwerd]

Let me know when/were I should be contributing some text to explain to instructors what these things are.

I think Steven and I have loose plans to begin work on an instructor version during the Edit-A-Thon, in which case there will be a way to add a note at the beginning about this and anything else we want to communicate to instructors.

[StevenClontz]

hmmm..."looking ahead" implies an element of "preview" in the activities, which isn't necessarily true.

How do you feel about "Checking In" or "Self-Assessment"?

The main purpose of these activities is for students to see if they really have it, or need to do a little more review, etc.

Leaving this question open as it's discussed in TeamBasedInquiryLearning/library#28

[StevenClontz]

I'm inclined to approve and merge given the structure of this content, without reviewing the pedagogical content as I trust @jkostiuk to use this in the fall and make appropriate adjustements.

However we need to address the removal of a writing activity from GT2 before merging.

[jford1906]

It's the breaking of the one writing activity into 3, right? I'm fine with that.

…

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 9:30 PM Steven Clontz ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In source/05-GT/02.ptx <#389 (comment)> : > - </exploration> - <exploration> - <statement> - Prove that the determinant of any diagonal matrix, upper triangular matrix, or lower triangular matrix, is the product of it's diagonal entries. - </statement> - In any case: typo it's -> its — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#389 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACOAEH2N74YE2P6KM4343KTZJIRTJAVCNFSM6AAAAABJQQ7H7WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDCNBQGMYTAMBVGA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.*** .com>

[jkostiuk]

yes, my bad, meant to comment. I felt that @jford1906 exploration was exactly what the cooldown needed so I just did a cut-and-paste.