Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cleaned Up Pascal README #2274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2020
Merged

Cleaned Up Pascal README #2274

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2020

Conversation

auroq
Copy link
Contributor

@auroq auroq commented Oct 18, 2020

  • I created/updated the language README (see contributing documentation)
    • I added the sample program name to the README
    • I added fun facts (i.e. debut developer, typing, etc.)
    • I added reference link(s) to the README
    • I added solution citations when necessary (see plagiarism)

Other Notes

We forgot to check for links when we merged several of the Pascal PRs

@auroq auroq requested a review from jrg94 October 18, 2020 16:56
jrg94
jrg94 approved these changes Oct 18, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jrg94 jrg94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great changes! 👍

@jrg94 jrg94 changed the title Add missing snippets to and cleanup pascal readme Cleaned Up Pascal README Oct 18, 2020
@jrg94 jrg94 self-assigned this Oct 18, 2020
@jrg94 jrg94 added the enhancement Any code that improves the repo label Oct 18, 2020
@jrg94 jrg94 merged commit b00e70d into master Oct 18, 2020
@jrg94 jrg94 deleted the pasreadme branch October 18, 2020 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jrg94 jrg94 jrg94 approved these changes

Assignees

@jrg94 jrg94

Labels
enhancement Any code that improves the repo
Projects
Documentation
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@auroq @jrg94