Added FizzBuzz in Pyret #3465
Merged
Added FizzBuzz in Pyret #3465
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jrg94
added
enhancement
rzuckerm
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Congrats on taking the first step to contributing to the Sample Programs repository maintained by The Renegade Coder!
For simplicity, please make sure that your pull request includes one and only one contribution.
Please fill one of the sections below as applicable.
Please also add any other relevant information to the Notes section at the bottom.
You may delete or just ignore any other sections.
For more information please refer to our contributing documentation
I Am Adding a New Code Snippet in an Existing Language
Add {PROJECT} in {LANGUAGE}formatOther Notes
It's been some time since I've contributed! This was a tough one to write since Pyret is such a strange language. Loops don't really exist in the way you'd expect, so I opted for a recursive solution.