Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checked options.include when filtering tags #10163

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 14, 2018
Merged

Checked options.include when filtering tags #10163

merged 1 commit into from Nov 14, 2018

Conversation

allouis
Copy link
Contributor

@allouis allouis commented Nov 14, 2018

no-issue

Was only checking the query before and not the options which is used from the internal api calls

allouis referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2018
closes #10118

All behind a members labs switch for now

* Added filter for member only content

* Updated frame context

* Cleaned up members content check

* Cleanup

* Cleanup

* Ensured members filtering works without include=tags

* Protected against missing query

* Fixed usage of include vs withRelated

* Moved includeTags logic for members behind members flag to use tags

* Cleanup

* Update input serializer dependency

Co-Authored-By: rishabhgrg <zrishabhgarg@gmail.com>

* Added some explanations
@kirrg001
Copy link
Contributor

🐛 Checked options.include when filtering tags

The user won't understand this bug fix.
IMO this does not need an emoji at all?
The logic is only executed if members is enabled and this is an experimental, not announced feature or?

@allouis
Copy link
Contributor Author

allouis commented Nov 14, 2018

😩 these emojis!!!

@allouis
Copy link
Contributor Author

allouis commented Nov 14, 2018

updated commit!

@allouis allouis changed the title 🐛 Checked options.include when filtering tags Checked options.include when filtering tags Nov 14, 2018
@allouis allouis merged commit 95ba6a5 into TryGhost:master Nov 14, 2018
@allouis allouis deleted the fix-includes-check branch November 14, 2018 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants