adding princeton roles and first shot at site preview on circle

[vsoch]

This will add two Princeton roles, along with the site preview on Circle. This will not be ready for review until I can get circle working (and hopefully it will trigger, otherwise I'll need to add the recipe in a separate PR!)

• This will close Site needs CI preview on Circle #1

Signed-off-by: vsoch vsochat@stanford.edu

[vsoch]

Okay we're good! As with most circle urls, the links won't actually work since we need to use index.html instead of the equivalent path without it. There are a few links on the site that use relative_path that aren't rendering correctly, but since it wouldn't link to the correct resource anyway, I think it's okay as is. Here are the links to view for this PR:

• the index: https://6-328271248-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/rse-roles/index.html
• https://6-328271248-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/rse-roles/role/2020/research-software-engineer-princeton-orfe/index.html
• https://6-328271248-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/rse-roles/role/2020/research-software-engineer-princeton-social-sciences/index.html

@cosden would you care to review?

[cosden]

@vsoch sorry for being so incredibly slow with this. It seems the artifacts are gone, so I've attempted to rerun the circle preview and take a look!

[vsoch]

Ok! Let me know what you think!

[cosden]

@vsoch: First off, this is a great idea and I like the sit design and structure very much. I have a few suggestions/comments that might not be appropriately scoped for this PR. I'll try my best in the context of the two Princeton roles. I'd remove the parenthetical parts of the title "(ORFE)" and "(social sciences)" as they aren't really part of the titles. However, it would be really good to have this information captured somewhere.

I think about who is going to use this and think that it would be desirable to have the following captured for each JD (ideally in a searchable fashion):

• Formal Job title
• Organization
• Organization type
• Department
• Category
• Full time/part time
• Domain

So for example:

• Research Software Engineer, Senior RSE, Scientific Programmer, Computer Scientist
• Princeton University, ORNL,
• University, National Lab, Industry
• Research Computing, Molecular Biology, Computer Science,
• IT, Research
• Full time
• Molecular Biology, Economics, HPC, etc

If this gets to be a big enough database having the ability to sift through different roles based on keywords in these categories would be great.

I think this could all be added later. So I'm fine with these Princeton roles and we can always come back later and add these categories/classifications.

[vsoch]

@cosden that's great feedback! I do think that's a direction we would want to go in. For now I'm just trying to get descriptions, period, so would you want to copy paste your careful thinking into an issue so we have it for the future, when we re-organize things?

[cosden]

OK. Moved longer comments to issue #4. Also made some small changes to the description because I have more than 2 that I can put in here. They are all similar wording so I don't know how much they add (they have different primary partnerships but much of the text is the same). @vsoch if/when it would be useful to add them here, let me know.

[vsoch]

@cosden if there are others that are somewhat different and would be useful to have, if you want to send them to me I can do another PR. If the differences are subtle but comparable here, we could have a section that describes this (in the same post). If they are so similar it wouldn’t be hugely interesting to have the redundancy, then we can skip. It’s up to you, I’m good with either.

[cosden]

The others for my group are 90% the same text. However the difference is in the scientific domain/applications, so interesting they are fundamentally quite different. My opinion would be to leave them off for now so as not to make anything about this valuable resource Princeton dominant. There are other groups at Princeton too that can/should be captured. Once we have 100 unique roles (we can hope!), having 10 very similar ones from my group matters far less.

[cosden]

These are good to go from my perspective!

[vsoch]

let's merge!!