Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider passing output_path to pre_config #146

Closed
joshrsmith opened this issue Mar 11, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Consider passing output_path to pre_config #146

joshrsmith opened this issue Mar 11, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@joshrsmith
Copy link
Contributor

Similar to post_check it may be nice for pre_config to be provided with the output_path.
This can allow for generated testbench input stimulus files to be generated alongside other testbench working files.

This seems like it is a potentially breaking change since it changes the function signature. Compatibility code and exception handling could probably be introduced to accommodate either signature.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@joshrsmith