Oh nice, I had thought that v4 would require substantive changes to the codebase but it seems the v3 changes were enough. Testing this locally things seem to work fine for me—great work.

Ps. this also closes #1078

Oh nice, I had thought that v4 would require substantive changes to the codebase but it seems the v3 changes were enough. Testing this locally things seem to work fine for me—great work.

Ps. this also closes #1078

Yea it was thank you so much. Want to use this but hard time passing it through security :( even with your partial fix

Was just about to start working on the v4 port, but then saw this pr.
Tested this locally and everything works fine for me also.

Thanks for the great work @Jordan-Hall and @shamoon.

Any updates on this? We have complains about this vulnerability and I am trying to hold it off but we might need to either fork or replace this library.

Thanks for the work tho!

Could someone please approve the PR and make a release? Thank you!

please process a PR

Do we know how much longer until this is released? We may have to go with another library if it is not resolved this week.

Is this library dead? Any good alternatives?

If its dark i'll release a fork or @shamoon might want too

I think the author just updates it infrequently but I dunno. I don’t plan to create a fork.

I see few issues with this PR. One issue that I can reproduce is whenever I can toggle "Show all pages" - the same pdf will be appended on top of already rendered pdf.

@shamoon thank you so much for taking a look and trying to manage PRs/Issues!

Thank you for @VadimDez for looking into this. Looking forward for the upgrade to take place. The #1109 dependency on pdfjs is preventing two of my applications to be released.

I see few issues with this PR. One issue that I can reproduce is whenever I can toggle "Show all pages" - the same pdf will be appended on top of already rendered pdf.

@shamoon thank you so much for taking a look and trying to manage PRs/Issues!

Hmm ok i'll take a look at that sorry

I think this should do it

--- a/src/app/pdf-viewer/pdf-viewer.component.ts
+++ b/src/app/pdf-viewer/pdf-viewer.component.ts
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ import type {
   PDFViewerOptions,
   ZoomScale
 } from './typings';
-import { PDFSinglePageViewer } from 'pdfjs-dist/web/pdf_viewer.mjs';
 import { GlobalWorkerOptions, VerbosityLevel, getDocument } from 'pdfjs-dist';

 if (!isSSR()) {
@@ -64,7 +63,7 @@ export class PdfViewerComponent
   public eventBus!: PDFJSViewer.EventBus;
   public pdfLinkService!: PDFJSViewer.PDFLinkService;
   public pdfFindController!: PDFJSViewer.PDFFindController;
-  public pdfViewer!: PDFJSViewer.PDFViewer | PDFSinglePageViewer;
+  public pdfViewer!: PDFJSViewer.PDFViewer | PDFJSViewer.PDFSinglePageViewer;

   private isVisible = false;

@@ -435,6 +434,10 @@ export class PdfViewerComponent
   }

   private setupViewer() {
+    if (this.pdfViewer) {
+      this.pdfViewer.setDocument(null as any);
+    }
+
     assign(PDFJS, 'disableTextLayer', !this._renderText);

     this.initPDFServices();

The README should probably be updated to note that Angular 17+ is required for the latest PDFJS version due to the usage of Promise.withResolvers.

When it will be released in npm?

Can we publish a beta version of the NPM while we polishing the PR? Thank you!

@VadimDez any reason why this can't be merged?

Well – since the issues noted by @VadimDez aren't fixed (even though @shamoon already wrote how to fix them), this will not move forward.

@Jordan-Hall can you please update the PR with the changes so this even has the chance of being looked at and merged?

Well – since the issues noted by @VadimDez aren't fixed (even though @shamoon already wrote how to fix them), this will not move forward.

@Jordan-Hall can you please update the PR with the changes so this even has the chance of being looked at and merged?

Since @Jordan-Hall hasn't responded in a while, I decided to resurrect the PR myself & address the issues brought forth. #1128 should satisfy those issues.

It was on my list today. Sorry I no longer work for the company that needed this but was doing it today. But thank you so much for sorting this. I know I need it soon for personal projec