Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(create): upgrade templates to very_good_analysis v3.0.1 #429

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

felangel
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • feat(create): upgrade templates to very_good_analysis v3.0.1

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

@felangel felangel added the feature A new feature or request label Jun 15, 2022
@felangel felangel self-assigned this Jun 15, 2022
@felangel felangel requested a review from jorgecoca as a code owner June 15, 2022 18:57
renancaraujo
renancaraujo previously approved these changes Jun 15, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@renancaraujo renancaraujo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can read Base64. It is allright

wolfenrain
wolfenrain previously approved these changes Jun 15, 2022
@felangel felangel dismissed stale reviews from wolfenrain and renancaraujo via 8314b06 June 15, 2022 21:51
@felangel felangel merged commit 0daf130 into main Jun 15, 2022
@felangel felangel deleted the feat/bricks-very-good-analysis-3.0.1 branch June 15, 2022 22:00
@felangel felangel mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2022
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants