Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Number overload to g and G #1486

Closed
Steffan153 opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Number overload to g and G #1486

Steffan153 opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
deferred This issue will be reopened and completed if ever the number of contributors spikes again enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Steffan153
Copy link
Contributor

Either operate on digits (which is arguably useless) or do something else

@chunkybanana
Copy link
Member

I was considering making them sufficiently_large_number(n) (nth's grahams number, lifetime of worm [n], something like that). We'd never need a sane upper bound again!

@edison1119 edison1119 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 18, 2022
@lyxal lyxal added version-3 For issues relating to Vyxal 3 version-2 For issues relating to Vyxal 2 labels Mar 21, 2023
lyxal added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2023
@lyxal lyxal closed this as completed in a00210e Apr 1, 2023
@lyxal
Copy link
Member

lyxal commented Apr 1, 2023

didn't mean to close

@lyxal lyxal reopened this Apr 1, 2023
@lyxal lyxal closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 18, 2023
@lyxal lyxal added deferred This issue will be reopened and completed if ever the number of contributors spikes again and removed version-3 For issues relating to Vyxal 3 version-2 For issues relating to Vyxal 2 labels Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deferred This issue will be reopened and completed if ever the number of contributors spikes again enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants