-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spec skeleton for interacting with the fenced frame config mapping #616
Conversation
05d82f9
to
524a1f0
Compare
2129554
to
2019c08
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a number of TODOs here which are hard to evaluate. It would be good to know how many of them are going to be resolved in this PR vs after.
Separately: will there be a follow-up to #593 (review) where we actually resolve the promise with a web-exposed FencedFrameConfig object that internally references the config struct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK it sounds like there is some pending work in this PR so let me know when I should take another look next!
I'll try closing and re-opening this to kick off the PR preview thing again, see if it is "fixed" now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pretty much lgtm with a few pretty small things!
) SHA: e332640 Reason: push, by miketaylr Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Preview | Diff