Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Local implementation is inefficient #140

Open
orian opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Local implementation is inefficient #140

orian opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@orian
Copy link

orian commented Jun 9, 2017

I think local container should use joined path:

path.Join(c.path, path.Dir(prefix))

when listing items. Otherwise if a container is set with / path it tries to flatten all directory structure in filesystem.
@orian orian changed the title Local implementation is extremely inefficient Local implementation is inefficient Jun 9, 2017
This was referenced Jul 12, 2017
Closed
Open
aldor007 added a commit to aldor007/stow that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2017
@aldor007
Change way of handling local storage. Now ID and Name are almost the
85fda1a 
same in this adapter. Fix for issue WasabiAiR#109 and WasabiAiR#140
@urisimchoni urisimchoni mentioned this issue Jun 24, 2019
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@orian