Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 22, 2021. It is now read-only.

Agenda for sync meeting 1/8/2021 #410

Closed
tlively opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed

Agenda for sync meeting 1/8/2021 #410

tlively opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 8 comments

Comments

@tlively
Copy link
Member

tlively commented Dec 22, 2020

The next meeting will be Friday, January 8 at 9:00AM - 10:00AM PST/ 6:00PM - 7:00PM CET. Please respond with agenda items you would like to discuss.

If this meeting doesn't already appear on your calendar, or you are a new attendee, please fill out this form to attend.

Agenda so far:

@omnisip
Copy link

omnisip commented Dec 22, 2020

If #395 is prototyped on x64/arm64 with the External References mechanism, I'd love to be able to discuss some results in this meeting.

@Maratyszcza
Copy link
Contributor

Maratyszcza commented Dec 24, 2020

I'd like to discuss the missing i64x2 instruction forms: PR #381, #411, #412, #414, #415, #417, #418

@lars-t-hansen
Copy link
Contributor

We should revisit the instructions that reached provisional consensus at the last meeting and make sure everyone's on board. (I have no objections to these.)

@Maratyszcza
Copy link
Contributor

Also, lets discuss untyped form of any_true instruction (#416)

@penzn
Copy link
Contributor

penzn commented Jan 5, 2021

We should revisit the instructions that reached provisional consensus at the last meeting and make sure everyone's on board. (I have no objections to these.)

I don't have objections either. Sorry, took me a while to find the issue.

@Maratyszcza
Copy link
Contributor

Sign select (#124) if @rrwinterton is able to look into its Alder Lake performance

I don't have data for Adler Lake, but per Instlatx64 dump Tremont core (Adler Lake predecessor) runs BLENDVPS/BLENDVPD/PBLENDVB with latency of 3 and reciprocal throughput of 2, which is a substantial improvement over Goldmont (latency 4, rcp throughput 4), and is an improvement over the SSE2-level emulation sequence.

@dtig
Copy link
Member

dtig commented Jan 7, 2021

As we've had the new proposal freeze for some time now, I'd like to get add a discussion item for Phase 4 timeline/requirements.

@tlively
Copy link
Member Author

tlively commented Jan 8, 2021

@tlively tlively closed this as completed Jan 8, 2021
ngzhian added a commit to ngzhian/simd that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2021
This was accepted into this proposal in WebAssembly#410.
ngzhian added a commit to ngzhian/simd that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2021
This was accepted into this proposal in WebAssembly#410.
ngzhian added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2021
This was accepted into this proposal in #410.
ngzhian added a commit to ngzhian/simd that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2021
This was accepted into this proposal in WebAssembly#410.
ngzhian added a commit to ngzhian/simd that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2021
This was accepted into this proposal in WebAssembly#410.
ngzhian added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2021
This was accepted into this proposal in #410.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants