Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

'make' generates 4 executables #102

Closed
lukewagner opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

'make' generates 4 executables #102

lukewagner opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@lukewagner
Copy link
Member

After the recent Makefile changes (which makes things much nicer), the first run of 'make' generates 'wasm' and 'unopt'. The second run adds 'main.native' and 'main.d.byte'. Ideally, 'make' would only generate 1 executable. For ease of use, maybe this should be the unopt build and you have to type 'make opt' to get the opt build?
@rossberg rossberg mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2015
Merged
@jfbastien jfbastien mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2015
Closed
eqrion pushed a commit to eqrion/wasm-spec that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2019
@binji
[interp] Don't trap on zero-bytes out-of-bounds (WebAssembly#102)
d18ec64
alexcrichton pushed a commit to alexcrichton/spec that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2019
@arunetm
Merge pull request WebAssembly#102 from Maratyszcza/andnot
f31b325 
ANDNOT operation
Connicpu pushed a commit to Connicpu/wasm-spec that referenced this issue May 11, 2020
@rossberg
[spec] First steps towards an abstract machine with threads & events (W…
6e0822f 
…ebAssembly#102)
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2023
@rossberg
Merge pull request WebAssembly#102 from q82419/q82419/test-register-name
b062307 
Use another name for registering a new module in test.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lukewagner