Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add project planning weeks of work averaging script #3412

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

AetherUnbound
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Similar to #3364.

This PR adds a script which can be used to compute the average weeks of work for projects once the maintainers have provided values for each project. Full description of the script is in the README.md.

Testing Instructions

Due to the nature of the voting, this presently can only be tested by Openverse maintainers.

  1. Run pipenv install in the new directory
  2. Download the voting spreadsheet (access restricted) as a ".xlsx" file (default location is data/week_votes.xlsx within the project_planning directory).
  3. Run pipenv run python calculate_average_weeks_of_work.py and verify the files were generated in outputs/

Checklist

  • My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title likeUpdate index.md).
  • My pull request targets the default branch of the repository (main) or a parent feature branch.
  • My commit messages follow best practices.
  • My code follows the established code style of the repository.
  • I added or updated tests for the changes I made (if applicable).
  • I added or updated documentation (if applicable).
  • I tried running the project locally and verified that there are no visible errors.
  • I ran the DAG documentation generator (if applicable).

Developer Certificate of Origin

Developer Certificate of Origin
Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1

Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.


Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
    have the right to submit it under the open source license
    indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
    of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
    license and I have the right under that license to submit that
    work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
    permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
    in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
    person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
    it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
    are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
    personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
    maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
    this project or the open source license(s) involved.

@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound requested a review from a team as a code owner November 29, 2023 00:38
@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound added 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed 🌟 goal: addition Addition of new feature labels Nov 29, 2023
@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound added the 🤖 aspect: dx Concerns developers' experience with the codebase label Nov 29, 2023
@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound added the 🧱 stack: mgmt Related to repo management and automations label Nov 29, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added 🏷 status: label work required Needs proper labelling before it can be worked on 🚦 status: awaiting triage Has not been triaged & therefore, not ready for work labels Nov 29, 2023
@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound removed 🏷 status: label work required Needs proper labelling before it can be worked on 🚦 status: awaiting triage Has not been triaged & therefore, not ready for work labels Nov 29, 2023
@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound requested review from dhruvkb and removed request for fcoveram November 29, 2023 00:44
Copy link
Contributor

@sarayourfriend sarayourfriend left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool! Awesome to have these scripts documented so well.

@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound merged commit 4e32bc7 into main Nov 29, 2023
77 checks passed
@AetherUnbound AetherUnbound deleted the feature/week-averaging-script branch November 29, 2023 19:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖 aspect: dx Concerns developers' experience with the codebase 🌟 goal: addition Addition of new feature 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed 🧱 stack: mgmt Related to repo management and automations
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants