Add accesstoken and ThrottledApplication to admin panel

[bjornthiberg]

Fixes

Fixes #3711 by @AetherUnbound

Description

This PR adds oauth_provider.models.AccessToken and api.models.oauth.ThrottledApplication tables to the Django Admin UI.

All fields are set as read-only. We are not sure if this is done in the best way. Also, in the issue (#3711), it was said that:

While I initially thought this would be good as read-only, we might even want to enable editing of certain fields so that access can be revoked by maintainers using the Admin UI as well.

We did not know which fields should be set as editable. Hence the draft PR.

Testing Instructions

Test by opening the Django admin panel and looking at the new entries in the sidebar.

Checklist

• My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title likeUpdate index.md).
• My pull request targets the default branch of the repository (main) or a parent feature branch.
• My commit messages follow best practices.
• My code follows the established code style of the repository.
• I added or updated tests for the changes I made (if applicable).
• I added or updated documentation (if applicable).
• I tried running the project locally and verified that there are no visible errors.
• I ran the DAG documentation generator (if applicable).

Developer Certificate of Origin

Developer Certificate of Origin

Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1

Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.


Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
    have the right to submit it under the open source license
    indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
    of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
    license and I have the right under that license to submit that
    work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
    permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
    in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
    person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
    it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
    are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
    personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
    maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
    this project or the open source license(s) involved.

[sarayourfriend]

Dhruv and I are at WordCamp Asia next week, so pinging @WordPress/openverse-api to reassign reviews on this to folks who are available.

Regarding the editable fields, please make rate_limit_model editable. It's probably also a good one to add to search fields, so we can easily see client IDs in each rate limit model.

I'm not 100% sure how revoking access would work. Deleting the ThrottledApplication instance doesn't seem like the right way to go (just thinking of that being an option), but if we had a new rate limit model called "deny", or something along those lines, that could work. From my perspective this is something for a separate issue, though, as it needs a bit of thought from @WordPress/openverse-maintainers to decide what the technical and decision making process would be.

[zackkrida]

Hi @bjornthiberg, Openverse maintainers are going to take a look at your PR this week! Thank you for the contribution 🎉

I did want to make sure you saw the notes from @sarayourfriend concerning editable fields. Thank you!

[AetherUnbound]

Thanks for the contribution! I have one code request change, in addition to Sara's note about editable fields above.

[krysal]

Thank you for starting this @bjornthiberg. I'm adding just a quick comment to the previous reviews.

[krysal]

Looks good to me! Thank you for working on this, @bjornthiberg and Co 👏

[AetherUnbound]

This looks great and works well locally, thanks for addressing all the changes!