Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce new variables from corrected LCE map #195

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 10, 2018

Conversation

MAVJ
Copy link
Contributor

@MAVJ MAVJ commented Jan 5, 2018

This PR will introduce the new correction for s1 when using the LCE map calculated after decouling electric field effects after taking the average (convergence value) for the electron lifetimes as discussed in #189

Additional information can be found in the Summary Note of this topic.
Changes:

  • The new variable out from the implementation of the corrected LCE map will be called "cs1", while the previous variables will be changed to "cs1_no_field_corr" (or any suitable name).

Summary results:

  • SR0
    stages_iteration_sr0

Correction map:
3d_map_lce_true_final_correction_sr0

Comparison results:
corrections_comparison_sr0

  • SR1
    stages_iteration_calibration_3_feb

Correction map:
3d_map_lce_true_final_correction_calibration_3_feb

Comparison results:
corrections_comparison_calibration_3_feb

If there is something that I missed please just let me know (I'll close #189)

Depends on XENON1T/pax#661

Introduce new correction for s1 when using the LCE map calculated after decouling electric field effects.

The new variable will be called "cs1", while the previous correction will be changed to "cs1_no_field_corr"
Miguel Ángel Vargas and others added 3 commits January 5, 2018 13:40
Change made in init:
Add the path of the update LCE map for SR1 and the path for the new map of SR0. Waiting to be included in PAX, by PR #661
@pdeperio pdeperio requested a review from coderdj January 5, 2018 19:06
@zachgreene
Copy link

just as a reminder, Sara's Kr-83m lifetime values dropped when she used the FV I was using as well as s2_bottom by ~10-15 us. Not sure if your lifetime values have been compared with her new ones

@MAVJ
Copy link
Contributor Author

MAVJ commented Jan 6, 2018

Thank you for the info @zachgreene.
Do you have by any chance the latest values she got? Qing suggested to me to overlay these values to the ones that I get when taking the convergence limit of the iterative approach. This could work as a comparison point.

Update with the new LCE maps (with field correction)

New corrected S1 with field :
cs1_a
cs1_b 

Old Ted's LCE map (no field correction)
cs1_a_no_field_corr 
cs1_b_no_field_corr
@pdeperio
Copy link
Contributor

pdeperio commented Jan 9, 2018

@MAVJ, @mcfatelin: so according to good agreement in the note here, and comparing the value in first plot above (~455) vs @sdiglio's Kr83m value (452.64), is this OK to merge?

@mcfatelin
Copy link
Contributor

Looks okay to me. Just want to add another reference for Miguel's comparisons.

@feigaodm feigaodm merged commit 2ca9789 into master Jan 10, 2018
@feigaodm feigaodm deleted the add_new_corrected_variables_s1 branch January 10, 2018 04:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants