Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint-plugin-import to version 1.16.0 🚀 #43

Closed

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

eslint-plugin-import just published its new version 1.16.0.

State Update 🚀
Dependency eslint-plugin-import
New version 1.16.0
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint-plugin-import.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 50 commits .

  • af062f1 Changlog fixes
  • 2946d4b bump to v1.16.0
  • 2524c09 Add no-dynamic-require rule (fixes #567) (#568)
  • 0f527d2 changelog note for #545
  • 24c04b7 Fix #545: allow re-export of defaults from ignored files (i.e. node_modules)
  • b6ac532 Fix #566: reject false positive on export default from '...'
  • c45fdc3 Merge remote-tracking branch 'ljharb/extensions_options' (#555)
  • 12bf6da Fix #564: Fix tests not running due to Espree bump (#565)
  • 515d159 chore(package): update nyc to version 8.3.0 (#562)
  • f507ff3 Cache extension settings using has.
  • e087ec4 updated resolvers/node/package.json to use "files" (fixes #531)
  • 2b471c7 changelog note for #485
  • c57beae Implement new rule: no-internal-modules (#485)
  • 32b5494 Merge pull request #561 from preco21/patch-1
  • 935f8a9 rebound links + corrected ES7

There are 50 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling bfc30e9 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 into 05b7fa1 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling bfc30e9 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 into 05b7fa1 on master.

@Xiphe Xiphe force-pushed the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 branch from bfc30e9 to 7bfaed1 Compare October 4, 2016 10:03
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 4, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 7bfaed1 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 into da22577 on master.

@Xiphe Xiphe force-pushed the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 branch from 7bfaed1 to 6993a27 Compare October 7, 2016 08:00
@Xiphe Xiphe force-pushed the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 branch from 6993a27 to 50dfb45 Compare October 7, 2016 08:01
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 7, 2016

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 50dfb45 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 7, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 50dfb45 on greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 into faebbc1 on master.

@Xiphe Xiphe closed this Oct 7, 2016
@Xiphe Xiphe deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-plugin-import-1.16.0 branch October 7, 2016 08:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants