Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should -nomx8 be the default for the GateMate? #4355

Open
spth opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should -nomx8 be the default for the GateMate? #4355

spth opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
pending-verification This issue is pending verification and/or reproduction

Comments

@spth
Copy link

spth commented Apr 23, 2024

Version

Yosys 0.40 (git sha1 a1bb025, g++ 13.2.0-13 -fPIC -Os)

On which OS did this happen?

Linux

Reproduction Steps

Synthesize a non-trivial design for the GateMate FPGA using default options.

Expected Behavior

yosys will synthesize something that can be used by the GateMate P&R tool.

This expected behaviour can actually be achieved by using -nomx8. So maybe that should be the default? AFAIK there is currently no P&R tool that can handle the MX8 cells (and I don't know if nextpnr will be able to do so, when it gets GateMate support).

Actual Behavior

yosys will likely use MX8 cells (I tested both yosys 0.38 and yosys 0.40). MX8 cells haven't been supported in the GateMate P&R tool for many months, so P&R will fail.

@spth spth added the pending-verification This issue is pending verification and/or reproduction label Apr 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pending-verification This issue is pending verification and/or reproduction
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant