Skip to content

ZaNa02/product-api-first

 
 

Repository files navigation

API Design Workshop

Requirements

Setup

  1. Fork this repo and pull in your local machine

  2. Edit and check the swagger file swagger.yaml

  3. Build the api image

This is only needed if you want to try the implementation of the designed API + API contract testing

make build
  1. Run the API
make run

Design challenge

As a new assignement you are asked to add a wishlist feature to our adidas ecom (website, native apps).

You've decided wisly to think API First and API Design First.

You've assigned 4 user stories:

  • As a user, I want to add a product in my wishlist
  • As a user, I want to retrieve my wishlist
  • As a user, I want to delete a specific product from mt wishlist
  • As a user, I want to clear my wishlist

Existing affordances (actions)

The existing core Product API privides this affordances:

  • Retrieve the list of products
  • Retrieve a single product
  • Create a product
  • Update an existing product (status...)
  • Retrieve reviews about a product
  • Add a product review
  • Create a user
  • Retrieve user profile

Step1. Let's describe what actions our API affords

TASK: List the new API affodrances

Step2. Let's draw!

The state machine diagram will help you to identify the main REST ressources and their relations.

TASK: In this step we extend an existing state diagrams for the proposed API. Each box in the diagram represents a possible representation. You can use arrows to indicate transitions from one box to the next.

Product API

  • Open this link
  • Edit the diagram

Step3. Formalize the design in the Open API Specification

The OAS file can be edited in whatever tool you like BUT NOT GENERATED FROM YOUR CODE, the most important thing is that the aprouved one (the contract) MUST be in Apiary.

TASK: Extend the existing swagger.yaml

Step4. Verify the design using Apiary Documentation and Apiary Mock Service

TASK: Try the Apiary mock service

Step5. Review the API Design

At this stage you:

  • Ask feedback from your API users by sending them the documentation link.
  • Ask feedback from your product owner

If your API looks like this remote control then your design is affordant!

Grandma Remote control

Step6. Sync your API contract

Every API description MUST be published in adidas API design platform (apiary.io) and SHOULD be stored in version control system (Bitbucket, GitHub) in the same repository as the API implementation.

TASKS:

  • Host your API in github
  • Setup up Github/apiary Sync

Step7. Setup API contract testing

Every API description (contract) using HTTP(S) protocol MUST be tested against its API implementation. The tests MUST be executed using the Dredd testing framework. The Dredd MUST report the test results to Apiary. In addition to local runs, the tests SHOULD be an integral part the API implementation's CI/CD pipeline. The CI/CD pipeline SHOULD be configured to run the test whenever there is a change to either API description (contract) or its implementation.

  • TASK: Install and run dredd

Some example of bad designed APIs

Missing description Missing examples Missing HAL Exposing internal model Missing support contact

Usage of acronyms, what's ATP stands for ? Missing description / context Missing HAL Missing support contact

Some example of good designed APIs

Sample APIs following the guidelines are available at adidas-group GitHub. The samples include the following:

Very simple API including implementation, testing, and full CI/CD lifecycle.

Real-world API with state transition, API key client app authentication, exposed via API management.

Sample API used as the template for newly created projects at Apiary.

Real-world Adidas Inventory API (WIP)

Demo API, including implementation and testing used during training.

Sample API showcasing description of complex query parameter rules.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Go 81.9%
  • Dockerfile 14.6%
  • Makefile 3.5%