Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add no-std support #621

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024
Merged

add no-std support #621

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

conradoplg
Copy link
Contributor

@conradoplg conradoplg commented Feb 27, 2024

I didn't add it to frost-ed448 because Ed448-Goldilocks doesn't support it. I'll eventually create a PR there and we can enable it in frost-ed448 later.

Closes #535

This is a draft just because it's a breaking change and we need to decide when to merge it. Otherwise it's ready.

@conradoplg conradoplg linked an issue Feb 27, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@conradoplg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this is a breaking change since it removes the Error trait impl. I'll change it so that only happens in no-std mode.

@conradoplg conradoplg marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2024 22:00
@conradoplg conradoplg marked this pull request as draft March 4, 2024 22:03
@drewstone
Copy link

In case it's useful I have a no_std lib of Ed448: https://github.com/webb-tools/Ed448-Goldilocks

@mpguerra mpguerra added the do-not-merge Tells Mergify not to merge this PR label May 28, 2024
@mpguerra mpguerra marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2024 16:15
@conradoplg
Copy link
Contributor Author

In case it's useful I have a no_std lib of Ed448: https://github.com/webb-tools/Ed448-Goldilocks

This is great, but we'd prefer if that was incorporated upstream. Did you consider opening a PR there?

@natalieesk natalieesk removed the do-not-merge Tells Mergify not to merge this PR label Jun 19, 2024
natalieesk
natalieesk previously approved these changes Jun 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@natalieesk natalieesk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 57c0b7b into main Jun 20, 2024
20 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the no-std branch June 20, 2024 09:07
natalieesk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2024
* add no-std support

* add no-std support to ciphersuite crates

* fix ci

* update changelog, use 'dep:' where appropriate

* additional fixes

* fix clippy issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support no_std
4 participants