Remove !!fuckable

[benjamingr]

http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/12900519#12900519

I don't think Fuckable should be a core command.

If we really want it we can add it with !!learnEval or somethng like that.

It can come off as rude to our 13+ crowd, and it's generally bad taste.

[ralt]

👍

Kill it.

Dead or alive? My choice: 👎

Did I just learn about emojis? I did.

[ryankinal]

👍

[nderscore]

Kill 👎

[rlemon]

I made the original user taught command, I can't remember who convinced Zirak to bake it in, but yea. I'm cool with it being removed. It was fun for a few days but now I think it just idles anyways.

[FirstWhack]

I think it was me and @rlemon that really pushed for it. Yeah, it's useless, but I wouldn't call it bad taste. Sex is a part of life. 

Anyway, I see no use for it, so if you want to remove it because of that, that makes sense.
All it does is tell you your maximum socially acceptable shagging age. No shame in that.

On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:54 PM, benjamingr notifications@github.com wrote:

http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/12900519#12900519
I don't think Fuckable should be a core command.
If we really want it we can add it with !!learnEval or somethng like that.
It can come off as rude to our 13+ crowd, and it's generally bad taste.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[FirstWhack]

I suppose I do probably have the highest acceptance rate of "taboo" things in the JS room. 
So there's probably shame in that, I guess, just not to me. 

On , Josiah South j.hawkinss@yahoo.com wrote:

I think it was me and @rlemon that really pushed for it. Yeah, it's useless, but I wouldn't call it bad taste. Sex is a part of life. 

Anyway, I see no use for it, so if you want to remove it because of that, that makes sense.
All it does is tell you your maximum socially acceptable shagging age. No shame in that.

On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:54 PM, benjamingr notifications@github.com wrote:

http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/12900519#12900519
I don't think Fuckable should be a core command.
If we really want it we can add it with !!learnEval or somethng like that.
It can come off as rude to our 13+ crowd, and it's generally bad taste.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[9034725985]

Are you going to remove !!urban next?

[benjamingr]

No, no reason to remove !!urban it has a use.

[ryankinal]

Yeah. The point is that things like !!urban, while they may be offensive when put to specific uses, are generally useful. There was a specific complaint about !!fuckable, and while not many chat users seem to be offended by the language and/or functionality, having it built into the bot seemed a little excessive.

So, to summarize:

!!fuckable is always profane
!!urban is only profane when used in specific ways

[9034725985]

How about replacing it with doable?

[ryankinal]

In the end, it still has to do with how young of a person you can have sex with. Which is a little creepy at best.

[9034725985]

Yeah, probably ok to remove.

[9034725985]

My only concern is a slippery slope. Someone has to actively invoke the
command so it is the person being creepy, not the bot.

[ryankinal]

In general, I think everybody is very aware of a slippery slope.

[mainerror]

I'll make sure to merge the changes this weekend. The command will be removed.

[Shmiddty]

We're talky about the slippery slopes of soapy asses, right?